The "Proposal" proposes that the reform of the national supervision system is a "major political reform" that concerns the overall situation and a "national anti-corruption working body" established under the unified leadership of the Party. It is necessary to implement organizational and institutional innovation, integrate anti-corruption resources, expand the scope of supervision, enrich the means of supervision, achieve comprehensive coverage of public officials exercising public power, and establish a centralized, unified, authoritative and efficient supervision system. According to the "Program", the supervision committee of the experimental area will be co-located with the Commission for Discipline Inspection.

In addition, the communiqué of the Sixth Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee, which was adopted on 20 16127, wrote that "Party committees at all levels should support and ensure that people's congresses, governments, supervisory organs and judicial organs at the same level supervise state organs and public officials according to law". This is the first time that China officials have mentioned "supervisory organs" together with people's congresses, governments and judicial organs.

In terms of means, the current administrative supervision law gives the supervisory organs the right of inspection, investigation, suggestion and administrative punishment. However, due to the limited supervision means scattered in various departments and biased towards post supervision, some methods are difficult to implement in practice.

Once reformed, the supervisory means of the board of supervisors will be optimized and enriched. In addition to the previous monitoring methods, auditing, anti-corruption and anti-blasphemy case investigation will all be integrated. In particular, in the past, only the procuratorate enjoyed the investigation measures of corruption and dereliction of duty, and the discipline inspection and supervision organs did not have this power. In the future, the supervisory committee may use criminal detention, arrest and even residential surveillance.

There is also the cost of the investigation. At present, in the process of investigating and dealing with violations of discipline, the Commission for Discipline Inspection only has means and measures within the Party. Although you can also collect some evidence, transcripts, confessions, etc. In order to become evidence in judicial proceedings, it must be transformed twice by the procuratorate. In this process, not only problems may occur, but also variables may occur, leading to futility. If the supervisory committee enjoys the right to investigate anti-corruption and anti-blasphemy cases, it will greatly reduce the necessity of transformation. This not only solves the legal problem of restricting the personal freedom of suspects who violate the law and discipline, but also fills the obstacles and loopholes in the process of convergence and coordination between discipline inspection organs and judicial organs, and will also be subject to greater legal constraints.