1. If relatives are sincere in returning, but temporarily unable to repay in full or in one lump sum, they may consider giving them an appropriate and reasonable grace period or repayment by installments; 2, relatives have the sincerity to return, but due to objective reasons, they can't repay, so prosecution should be arranged as soon as possible based on the consideration of the limitation of action; 3. If relatives are not sincere in repayment, but have the ability to repay, it is suggested to take appropriate measures to pressure them to repay. If the non-litigation means cannot achieve the dunning effect, it is suggested to take litigation immediately and consider taking litigation preservation. 4. It is impossible to judge whether relatives have the sincerity to repay or not, and it is suggested to exert pressure in an appropriate way to force your relatives to react, so as to correctly judge the above situation and follow the 1-3 methods. Legal objectivity:

Article 12 of the Civil Code stipulates that if the civil rights and interests are infringed, the infringed has the right to request the infringer to bear the tort liability. Legal basis: Article 65 of the Civil Procedure Law, the parties shall provide evidence in time for their claims. The people's court shall, according to the claims of the parties and the trial of the case, determine the evidence that the parties should provide and its time limit. If it is really difficult for the parties to provide evidence within the time limit, they may apply to the people's court for an extension of the time limit, and the people's court shall extend the time limit appropriately according to the application of the parties. If a party provides evidence within the time limit, the people's court shall order it to explain the reasons; If the people refuse to explain the reasons or the reasons are untenable, the people's court may, according to different circumstances, reject the evidence, or accept the evidence but admonish it and impose a fine.