The misunderstanding of this kind of stock trading operation is often welcomed by the majority of investors. Suppose a stockholder buys a stock at the price of 14 yuan, then buys the same amount of stock at the price of 13 yuan, and continues to make up the position at the price of 12 yuan. At this time, it will increase the burden, and it is wrong to add positions all the way. Blindly adding positions is more likely to lead to the emergence of profits in 0.6 yuan. This is the operation of the liquidation method, constantly covering positions and balancing buying. Because the average cost is lower than the first purchase price, it seems that the cost is reduced and the profit is generated. However, if you analyze the problem carefully, you will find that this is not the case:

First of all, investors' three consecutive buying positions are divided into three independent processes:

First bought in 14 yuan and sold in 13.6 yuan; Loss 0.4 yuan.

The second time, 13 yuan bought, 13.6 yuan sold; Profit, 0.6 yuan.

The third time 12 yuan bought, 13.6 yuan sold; Profit 1.6 yuan.

Comparing the above data, we can find an obvious fact: the loss caused by the first purchase has not been reduced at all because of the subsequent covering and leveling operation, and its cost is still so much. On the contrary, in order to make up for the losses caused by the initial subscription, more funds are used to make up for the losses, which goes against investors' expectation of entering the stock market at the beginning, that is, accelerating the activities of funds and obtaining more benefits.

In other words, the second 13 yuan and the third 12 yuan can actually invest in other stocks with clear trends, and the gains can also make up for the previous losses. It can also make up for the first loss with the same effect. Perhaps, the role of the fund will be better. The effect is exactly the same.

From this, we can draw a conclusion that the amortization operation method can not reduce the early buying cost, but can only make up for the loss by winning, and the biggest danger of doing so is that, first, the stock situation is not accurately judged, and if the stock market is not expected enough in the later period, it will increase the burden and get deeper and deeper.

On the other hand, think about it. Anyway, the ultimate goal is to make up for the loss by winning, and investors can make new decisions, such as investors:

You can transfer the stock funds to other stocks with clear trends and let the funds roll. Instead of continuing to hang on to uncertain bets, it is better to look for stocks that have been cleared. Although it is difficult to find new ideas, it is one of the most solid ways to protect interests.

Analyze the stock in hand, judge whether the stock has risen to a reasonable price, judge the influence of market environment on the stock, and understand the big market environment and stock information. If the stock does not rise to a reasonable price, investors can continue to hold it. However, for those stocks that have risen to a reasonable valuation, if they persist, it will cause a greater financial crisis, and it is better to give up.

The leveling method is certainly not omnipotent, so it should be used with caution to avoid getting bigger and heavier, locking in funds and causing a burden. We should use it carefully, frugally and rationally. At any time, we must be able to maintain a rational attitude when adopting any strategy.