Judicial robots can become a good legal intermediary, case, law analyzers, after all, on the integration of analysis of big data human brain is indeed not faster than the machine turn. Lawyer robots do have the potential to replace the paralegal, provided that if you do not request your paralegal to accompany the meal, errands, send information, buy coffee, counseling your children to do their homework. But in the current situation absolutely can not replace the majority of lawyers. I can imagine, a judge called the lawyer robot to the office to let him pay another 200 yuan postage but can not issue an invoice, the robot after a search, found that this request has no legal basis, and then quickly rejected the judge when the comical picture. Lawyers need to deal with a lot of things outside the law, we all know very well that many times "to the face, take the relationship" is the norm, we will say "big case to see the politics, in the case of the impact of the small case to see the law" situation, I think no one will be assured that my case to a robot. I don't think anyone would feel comfortable handing over their case to a robot. Unless, of course, the public prosecutors and law enforcement officers are all robots. I don't think I will see that day in my lifetime. Finally, legally speaking, the lawyer and the client is please agent relationship, the law can be confessed someday robots (things) can act as an agent, only to continue to discuss the meaning of the large part of the lawyer will not be replaced.