Although this seems to be a personal behavior, it has nothing to do with the enterprise. But the fact is that this enterprise did not retain employees because of providing snacks and drinks, but caused the loss of employees; If the resignee is an excellent employee, all kinds of early investment for the enterprise are the loss of human resources. Judging from the reaction of netizens, many people are eager for free snacks and drinks, as if this represents a good "welfare" for employees. I think this view deserves a big question mark. In addition to providing free meals, the company also provides rest beds and even shower facilities in the office to facilitate employees to work overtime. All employees are expected to stay at home 24 hours a day. Whether this is "welfare" or letting employees sacrifice their private time to create more profits for the company, I am afraid that the discerning person has his own answer. If the welfare and health of employees are really important, I think it is better to go to work on time and put an end to overtime, so that employees can have more time to buy food in the vegetable market, cook their own meals and cook healthily, and have more leisure time to exercise, stay with family and friends, and relieve the pressure brought by intense work. How much can snacks and drinks be worth? Junk food and carbonated drinks are the main culprits of obesity, and now even primary school students know it. Having said that, some people may retort that it is normal for you to see some large foreign companies regard free food and snacks as employee benefits. Google is famous for its good welfare, and one of its indicators is that it can find food within 150 feet. However, the so-called enterprise welfare is a comprehensive index. More importantly, Google also provides free fitness classes and gyms, free cancer screening, parental leave, and a comprehensive paid sick leave system. Therefore, the key to "quitting and going home to lose weight" is not that many young people are unreliable and the reasons for quitting are wonderful, but instead, we should ask: How do enterprises retain people? If our view of "welfare" always stays on all kinds of small-scale "welfare", rather than an institutional position to ensure that you can take paid leave when you are sick, and the arrangement of changing jobs and leaving your job is more humane, then if you are unfortunate enough to write your resignation letter in the future, you will never laugh.