A woman in Yancheng, Jiangsu Province was sentenced to three years and six months in prison for spraying paraquat on her neighbor's sausage. Liu lent his neighbor's acquaintance 50 thousand yuan. However, she never got the principal back. After seeing neighbors drying yuba and sausages in front of the door, she sprayed paraquat on yuba. When her neighbor found that yuba had an unknown blue color and thought it was broken, she picked it out and threw it away, but she didn't eat it. Liu didn't see the neighbor's reaction and thought that the dosage was not enough.

It turned out that many years ago, under the introduction and guarantee of his neighbor, Liu lent an acquaintance of his neighbor a sum of money, but he never paid it back. After repeated reminders, he only paid back 6.5438+0 million yuan, so he was resentful and waited for an opportunity to retaliate against his neighbors. It's terrible for Liu Can to do such a thing for 50 thousand yuan. Sausage is a homemade food that people love to see and hear. Whether it is for sale or for personal use, it is used to eat vegetables. Spraying pesticides on sausages is subjectively ignoring the personal health and safety of others.

Combined with the substance put in, the implementation environment, if the behavior. If it infringes on the interests of an unspecified majority, then its behavior will be suspected of releasing dangerous substances. If there is a specific object of infringement objectively, then its behavior will be suspected of intentional homicide. Fortunately, no one ate it, causing no casualties. Liu was finally sentenced to three years and six months in prison for committing the crime of throwing dangerous substances.

It is reasonable to think that Liu paid the legal price for his ignorance, but the cause of the incident also needs attention. The cause is a common private lending dispute. Liu doesn't know who the actual borrower is. Neighbors play the role of matchmaking and are also guarantors. A guarantor in the legal sense is not as simple as witnessing the debts of others. If there is no special agreement, it also has the status of joint guarantee, that is, when the borrower fails to repay the loan after the expiration of the loan period, the lender can either ask the borrower to repay the loan or ask the guarantor to assume the responsibility of repaying the loan within the scope of its guarantee.

The choice lies with the lender, who can sue them alone or together. In this case, Liu is the lender, the neighbor is the guarantor, and the neighbor's acquaintance is the borrower. If the acquaintance fails to repay the principal, or even loses contact, then Liu Can claims the creditor's rights from his neighbor alone and asks him to bear joint liability. Although there are prior consultation procedures for rural homestead and houses when they are enforced, they are not unenforceable.

However, Liu took it out on his neighbor's dried tofu and sausage. Finally, he sent himself to prison. This foolish behavior does nothing to help his creditor's rights. Therefore, in the face of the other party's debt default, netizens must not do stupid things to vent their anger, and must actively safeguard their legitimate claims through legal means.