Can't solve the problem as annoying as this thing now. If this self-employed person has so much money, he can't solve the problem at all. If this happens, it will definitely happen later. Then we should punish this self-employed, but we can't use such a serious punishment, because this punishment has directly bankrupted the other party and can't solve the fundamental problem. Therefore, if the law enforcement is well grasped, then the parties can be convinced. If the law enforcement is very serious and exceeds the capacity of the parties, it will be useless and even lead to very serious consequences.
If we want to grasp this law enforcement according to the specific situation, then the most important thing is to punish according to the amount involved in the case and the scope that the party can bear, and according to his personal situation. It's not a stick. Killing everyone is to punish so much money, so it is rich, so it is also to punish so much money, and then like this self-employed, it is also to punish so much money. In this case, there will be excessive punishment.
Generally speaking, if you want to better grasp the intensity of this law enforcement, then the most important thing is to punish according to the specific situation, so that this matter can be solved, rather than killing it with a stick. For the very rich, it is also a fine of so much money. For the very poor, it will lead to excessive punishment. For those who are very rich, it is useless.