Property tax "multi-room and multi-collection, long-term and multi-payment".

Let's not say whether this proposal is feasible or not. One thing is certain. If this policy is introduced at the early stage of the real estate bubble, it will definitely curb housing prices quickly. It is also the effectiveness of this tax payment method that determines that Pan Shiyi's proposal is not feasible.

In the past 20 years, the real estate industry has made outstanding contributions to the economic growth of China, and has a far-reaching impact on various industries. The real estate industry has promoted the development of construction, decoration, maintenance and other related industries, and is known as one of the four carriages of China economy. If the property tax is levied according to the policy of "multiple rooms, multiple incomes and long-term payment", the blow to the real estate industry will be extremely serious. And it will affect all real estate investors, banks and the whole industrial chain of real estate, which will cause a hard landing of the real estate industry.

China's current real estate leading policy is:

It is necessary to build a long-term mechanism for the healthy development of the real estate market, adhere to the positioning that houses are used for living, not for speculation, consolidate the main responsibility of the city government due to the city's policy and classified guidance, and improve the housing market system and housing security system.

This determines that even if the real estate tax is levied, it will start with moderation, so as to achieve a long-term mechanism for healthy development. Of course, if we want to realize the position that the house is used for living, not for speculation, it is inevitable to issue a certificate of real estate tax.

To sum up, Pan Shiyi's suggestion is not feasible. If you have different views, please comment and exchange, and Lao Liang is always welcome to talk about real estate.