The Party's Report to the 20th CPC National Congress clearly proposed to speed up the construction of a manufacturing power, a quality power, a space power, a transportation power, a network power and a digital China. Building a digital government is an inevitable requirement and an important part of implementing the strategy of strengthening the country by network and accelerating the construction of a digital China. The construction of digital government is gradually becoming an important engine to lead the digital economy, transform government functions and promote the high-quality development of society.
Since the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the construction of digital government has obviously warmed up. The Fourth Plenary Session of the 19th CPC Central Committee in 20 19, the Fifth Plenary Session of the 19th CPC Central Committee in 2020 and the "14th Five-Year Plan" in 200210 respectively put forward the requirements of promoting, strengthening and accelerating the construction of digital government. Literally, promoting, strengthening and speeding up the construction of digital government is only two words, but objectively it profoundly reflects the requirements of China municipal government.
Several problems in promoting the construction of digital government
The system and mechanism are not smooth, and it is difficult to promote it in coordination: At present, China's digital government construction has basically formed a high-level overall organizational leadership pattern, but there is a phenomenon that the national and local lead departments are not aligned. At the national level, the General Office of the State Council is responsible for organizing the promotion. At the provincial and municipal levels, the lead departments mainly include the government office (including the escrow government service bureau), the big data management department and the government administrative department.
Data responsibility and rights do not match, which makes it difficult to improve efficiency and add value: First, insufficient attention is paid to data governance; Second, data resources lack practical standards and norms; Third, the cross-level flow of data is insufficient.
The historical system is scattered, and it is difficult to integrate rules and regulations: first, the existing system is scattered, and the phenomenon of system flooding still exists; Second, the phenomenon of information chimney is prominent; Third, cross-departmental and cross-regional application collaboration and the construction of large systems and platforms are weak.