Because Darron Company is the punished person and Darron Company is the plaintiff. If the administrative reconsideration decides to change the original specific administrative act, the reconsideration organ is the defendant, so the Municipal Administration for Industry and Commerce is the defendant.
(2) As far as hierarchical jurisdiction is concerned, this case is not under the jurisdiction of the intermediate or higher courts, and this general administrative litigation is under the jurisdiction of the grassroots people's courts.
As far as territorial jurisdiction is concerned, if the administrative reconsideration changes the original specific administrative act, both the court where the administrative organ made the original specific administrative act and the court where the reconsideration organ is located have jurisdiction.
Therefore, to sum up, the grass-roots people's court where the administrative organ has made a specific administrative act and the grass-roots people's court where the reconsideration organ is located have jurisdiction.
(3) The claimant for administrative compensation is Darron Company, and the organ liable for compensation is the industrial and commercial bureau in Area B. The industrial and commercial bureau in Area B is the organ that initially caused the damage.
The claimant for administrative compensation is a person whose rights have been infringed by administrative acts. In this case, Dalong Company is the victim, so it is also the claimant of administrative compensation.
After reconsideration by the reconsideration organ, the administrative organ that initially caused the infringement is the organ liable for compensation, but if the reconsideration decision of the reconsideration organ aggravates the damage, the reconsideration organ shall perform the obligation for compensation for the aggravated part. The administrative penalty in this case was reconsidered by the Municipal Administration for Industry and Commerce, but the reconsideration decision of the Administration for Industry and Commerce did not aggravate the original administrative penalty. Therefore, the organ liable for compensation in this case is the B District Administration for Industry and Commerce.
(4) You can request.
(5) The scope of compensation may include direct economic losses caused by production suspension and fines collected.