At the beginning of 1 1, a consumer posted a video on a video platform questioning Simba's apprentice "Shi Da Mei" that the ready-to-eat bird's nest sold in the live broadcast room was sugar water instead of bird's nest. Later, it was forwarded and commented by many netizens. After this video became popular, it attracted more and more netizens' attention. Perhaps people who send videos in succession didn't expect that one of their own tucao videos would receive so many people's attention.
It was not until Simba explained this in the live broadcast room, and even opened several cans of new bird's nest to demonstrate the authenticity of the brand. By the way, after taking out the product inspection report to prove his innocence, he bluntly said, "I will sue these people for defamation if I lose everything." The storm was slightly alleviated. Who knows that in a few days, he was stoned by professional counterfeiter Wang Hai, which finally made this matter usher in a bigger storm and heated discussion. In the end, it really came to an end when Simba responded to the recall of all bird's nest products sold in the newly selected live broadcast room and took the responsibility of returning one and paying three. According to a preliminary estimate, the amount of compensation for bird's nest products alone is as high as 61983,000 yuan.
It is reported that at the beginning of1February, the market supervision departments in Guangzhou and Xiamen attached great importance to this matter and began to investigate. According to a staff member of Guangzhou Baiyun District Market Supervision Administration, the key product of this survey is the bird's nest sold by Simba, and even other products he sells will be within the scope of the survey. At present, because it involves asking the parties, testing and selling goods, etc., it is in the process of processing, and the specific news is not convenient to disclose now.
After all, it is a criminal offence to make and sell fake products with a particularly large amount, so it is necessary to show off that the parties concerned can be sentenced according to the amount and consequences. According to the relevant provisions of China's criminal law, "producers and sellers adulterate products, pass off fake products as genuine ones, shoddy products or pass off unqualified products as qualified products", and "if the sales amount is more than 2 million yuan, they will be sentenced to 15 years' imprisonment or life imprisonment, and they will also be fined more than 50% but less than 2 times the sales amount or their property will be confiscated".
The biggest problem now is to determine what role the Simba team played in this case before sentencing it. If he doesn't know the quality problem of bird's nest, and there is no intentional premise of subjective selling price, then he can be criminally punished, and it will not constitute a criminal offence. However, if he is aware of the quality problems of bird's nest and still sells it to consumers, it is an act of adulteration, shoddy and fake, which directly constitutes a criminal offence, and the specific consequences will depend on its impact.