Although global integration is good, according to Marxism, everything has two sides.

In the simplest terms, capitalists in developed countries, such as the United States, originally set up factories in the United States, which first brought employment. Secondly, they thought that workers were familiar with them and were afraid of losing them, so they had to pay high salaries to retain them. Moreover, shipping and communication were inconvenient in the past. Therefore, some hard jobs had to be found in their own countries. After all, workers were manual workers and tired, so they had to pay high salaries to hire people.

With the development of science and technology, there are refrigerators in shipping, tools such as WeChat in communication, and factory machines are gradually moving from simple and easy to use to automatic production. Workers can maintain factory production normally without too high academic qualifications, and the cost is reduced.

As a result, the factory moved out, all the original high-paying jobs were bye-bye, and workers were unemployed. Capitalists, on the other hand, are getting richer and richer because of the convenience brought by globalization, while bankers are getting richer and richer by investing in these companies.

Generally, workers, to tell the truth, some really don't have high academic qualifications, so it is impossible for a person in his 40 s to go to college again to study for a master's degree and find a job, right? Moreover, there used to be many factories. As long as you are willing to work and are not afraid of being tired, you can gradually accumulate capital to make money. Maybe you can be a boss someday, such as Hongkong and Li Ka-shing. Many people come out like this. When factories move out, society becomes a knowledge-based society, which requires high academic qualifications and often long working hours. It doesn't mean that you can do it if you want, but you can find it. How can those who used to be workers compete with those who just graduated? You are the boss. Who do you invite?

When the economic crisis comes, the first thing to save is to save these capitalists, which has caused many people to be dissatisfied. Obama has also been criticized for this. Why should he use the money of American civilians to help them wipe their bottoms?

Moreover, globalization will also bring many environmental problems. Some highly polluting enterprises can't get along in their own countries, so they go to places where environmental protection laws are not so strict, and the pollution is almost the same. Others legislate and manage them, and then go to other places to continue pollution. . .

Therefore, globalization needs to make some adjustments. . . After all, under the condition of the same employment population, factories have moved out one after another. Where do you want the original workers to find jobs? Where can I create those job gaps caused by the relocation of factories out of thin air? To put it bluntly, globalization will widen the gap between the rich and the poor in developed countries. . .

So now some countries are trying to solve some problems brought by globalization. Generally speaking, globalization has a bright future and twists and turns, which is normal. For example, some welfare countries levy heavy taxes on the rich and then use the money to subsidize national welfare. Or, as Trump did, he gave tax incentives and some tax operations to some large enterprises, forcing some factory processes to return to the United States (Trump also understands that it is impossible to return all of them, and there are not enough people in the United States, but at least we should strive for more jobs to go back). . .