Because people and property are all in the local area, public security organs at the provincial, city and county levels, as part of the local government, are all named after "so-and-so public security bureau", such as so-and-so provincial public security bureau, so-and-so city public security bureau and so-and-so county public security bureau. Anyone who sees these words in the public security bureau means that it is independent of people and property and is not managed by the public security organ at a higher level.

2. There are few public security bureaus in urban areas that are not named after sub-bureaus but directly called public security bureaus.

The reason why the public security departments in these urban areas are different from ordinary urban areas is mostly related to their past reforms, such as changing counties or county-level cities into urban areas or setting up high-tech development zones. For the sake of transition, similar urban areas will set up public security bureaus in a county-level structure, giving these urban public security bureaus county-level management power, rather than the dispatched offices of the municipal public security bureaus.

Management mode of public security organs

The public security organs implement a dual management mode, in which the business is vertically managed and guided by the public security system, and the people and property are managed by the territory. This is the management status of public security organs at the provincial, city and county levels.

Considering the particularity and importance of the public security organs' work responsibilities, local governments generally seek the opinions of the higher authorities of public security organs when appointing the principal responsible persons of public security organs. On the premise of not involving major personnel conflicts, they will always respect the opinions of the public security organs and give priority to the candidates recommended by the public security departments.

This makes many people mistakenly think that the personnel of public security organs are decided by the public security departments at higher levels. Actually, it's not. Except for the principal responsible person, most of the personnel appointments of other public security organs are still at the local level. The person in charge puts forward opinions, organizes departments to inspect and recommend, and finally it is decided by the local standing Committee.

If the cadre management authority is not in the organization department, it shall be determined by the unit according to its own actual adjustment and reported to the relevant departments for the record.