Myth 1: Solve the tax problems of enterprises through relationships.
Shenghua Real Estate Company's real estate sales are booming, with annual sales of 300 million yuan, in order to avoid the huge land value-added tax.
The boss of the company "coordinated" with the leaders of the local tax bureau through the relationship, and reached the intention of reducing the land value-added tax by 50%. However, he did not obtain the official approval document issued by the tax bureau, but obtained the acquiescence in the form of greeting from top to bottom, and the accountant of Shenghua Real Estate Company did not reflect the tax on the books.
Two years later, the inspection bureau conducted a tax inspection, and found that the unpaid land value-added tax of the enterprise was tax evasion, and it was fined as much as 60 million yuan. In the face of huge tax losses, the boss regretted it and had to think about such a question: can the use of relationships finally solve the corporate tax problem?
This is the current situation in China. Many bosses of enterprises, especially some big ones, have some social relations and tax resources. When they encounter difficult tax-related problems, their first reaction is to find ways to solve them. In reality, some problems can be solved in this way, but there are often many hidden dangers. This non-legal solution may eventually pay a heavy price.
Myth 2: Finance can handle tax-related issues well.
The fact that an enterprise has not been punished by tax does not mean that it has no tax-related problems. With the strengthening of national tax collection and management, the probability of tax-related problems in enterprises is increasing: on the one hand, the vastness and complexity of tax laws and the constant change of tax environment make it difficult for financial personnel to accurately and systematically master tax laws and adjust tax-related behaviors of enterprises in a timely and effective manner; On the other hand, corporate bosses are busy with business operations, generally pay little attention to finance or are unfamiliar with finance and neglect management. Finance often pursues the minimum tax burden unilaterally, which is easy to lead to tax evasion subjectively. Although there is a certain degree of "vague and achievable tax saving space" in corporate taxation, financial personnel failed to find out in time and strive for the most favorable tax definition through active communication with tax authorities, which may make corporate financial personnel unable to cope with tax-related issues.
In the financial practice of enterprises, limited by time and energy, financial personnel often cannot fully understand and grasp the tax policy, and it is almost a luxury to ask them to creatively use the tax policy and make legal tax planning. Therefore, when an enterprise encounters a thorny tax-related problem, it can often avoid risks and correctly solve the enterprise tax problem with the help of the wisdom and strength of intermediaries or experts, which may be the most convenient and economical solution mode.
Myth 3: If you hire a tax agent, you can definitely pay less taxes.
Although some bosses of enterprises have invited tax agents to be professional in tax management, there are still many deviations in their understanding of the real tax management role of tax agents. The most common thing is that enterprises must pay less taxes after inviting tax agents than those without them. In the eyes of enterprise bosses, the hired tax agency reduces the tax payment of enterprises through its relationship with the tax bureau and professional knowledge and skills. The tax agency is a bridge to dredge the relationship between tax enterprises and a tool to help enterprises achieve "reasonable" tax avoidance.
However, the boss of the enterprise doesn't realize that the amount of corporate tax payment, that is, the level of corporate tax burden, is based on the national tax law and ultimately depends on the business activities of the enterprise itself, not on the tax resources of tax agents and the harmonious relationship between tax enterprises. However, according to their own characteristics and actual production and operation activities, enterprises can pursue reasonable reduction of corporate tax burden and maximize tax-saving benefits by means of professional operation channels such as pre-planning, in-process guidance and post-reduction.
Myth 4: After the implementation of the Administrative Licensing Law, enterprises have no tax-related risks.
With the implementation of the Administrative Licensing Law of the People's Republic of China, State Taxation Administration of The People's Republic of China issued a series of documents to cancel and decentralize the examination and approval authority of a number of tax-related management projects, which expanded the tax autonomy of enterprises and reduced the tax examination and approval procedures. Therefore, many business executives intuitively believe that enterprises have more discretion in tax affairs, and enterprises have almost no tax-related risks. In fact, this is a misunderstanding. The administrative licensing law is a double-edged sword for enterprises. From a deep tax perspective, the tax-related risks of taxpayers have increased, because in practice, the rights and obligations of taxpayers are equal, and while enjoying the right of free declaration, they should also be responsible for the authenticity and integrity of tax declaration materials. For example, many local tax bureaus have stipulated that before the approval of making up for losses is cancelled, the tax bureau will issue a letter of confirmation of making up for losses to the enterprise after the losses of the enterprise in the loss-making year have been audited by an intermediary agency, and determine the amount of losses of the enterprise in that year. After the approval of making up for losses is cancelled, the tax bureau only verifies and inspects the results of making up for losses, and the treatment of late fees and fines for the differences in the determination of corporate losses is a real tax risk faced by enterprises.
Therefore, no matter what the reason, enterprises will face an unfavorable situation of being punished when their grasp of the discretionary scale of tax affairs is different from or greatly deviated from that of the tax bureau.
Please click on: building qualification, catering qualification and medical qualification to inquire about the business in each region.
How much is the qualification agency? Look for Mande enterprise service, the company is safe and efficient, the tax consultant is professional, and Mande enterprise service is a one-stop service expert.