There are usually two criteria for dividing the middle class, one is occupation, and the other is per capita or family income. It is controversial to distinguish the middle class by occupation. As for the staff of state organs, it is obviously difficult for directors and directors to compare with ordinary clerks and clerks. I am afraid that the income and social status gap between the staff of "important" organs such as the industrial and commercial bureau and the tax bureau and the staff of "ordinary" organs such as the Seismological Bureau, the Archives Bureau and the Bureau of Retired Veteran Cadres is also different. As IT technicians, some people may live in villas and drive foreign cars, and some people can only eat instant noodles and squeeze the bus every day. More people, including economists, tend to regard income as the only or main criterion for dividing the middle class. But even if everyone distinguishes who is middle class and who is not, there are still many uncertainties and quantitative confusion. For example, in the United States, some people think that people with an average annual income of $30,000 to $654.38+million belong to the middle class. According to this standard, more than 95% people in the United States should belong to the middle class. Others believe that the average annual income of the American middle class should be between $25,000 and $654.38 million+,and anyone with an average annual income within this range can be regarded as a middle class. By this standard, the American middle class accounts for about 80% of the total population.

From this point of view, we can't generalize people from several professions and have different views according to different standards! Generally speaking, it can be regarded as the middle class ~