College students are always a sensitive word; the rights of college students have always attracted more attention. Whether it is the creation of new educational concepts or the advancement of "university autonomy" in the context of the rule of law, it shows the urgency and necessity of protecting students' rights. The widely watched Luo Caixia case was delayed for a year due to jurisdictional objections after the court filed the case, and has not yet been heard. Luo Caixia was impersonated to attend college, but she has never received a legal explanation, which has aroused a lot of public discussion. Putting aside some emotional comments, we note that it took more than eight months just to deal with the jurisdiction objection. Luo Caixia, who seemed to have not lost much benefit, fought bravely and demonstrated a new legal theory: she was not only safeguarding her own legal rights, but also safeguarding the legitimate interests of the country, society and more students. If Luo Caixia enters the litigation process, then this lawsuit will obviously be different from ordinary civil litigation and different from foreign public interest litigation. It will be a composite lawsuit. Wang Jiajun's impersonation behavior is not only suspected of directly infringing Luo Caixia's legitimate interests of civil rights, but also directly infringing the legitimate interests of national administrative order. From the perspective of legal research, Wang Jiajun impersonated Luo Caixia and was suspected of violating her right to name and university admission. At the same time, his forgery of student status files was also suspected of violating relevant education administration laws and national documents and archives management laws. Therefore, the act of impersonation is suspected of infringing the civil rights of others and violating the interests of national management order. It is a combination of two illegal acts and may require more than two different legal consequences at the same time. Wang Jiajun's act of impersonation was an act of collusion. Therefore, those who participated in the conspiracy should also bear the legal consequences of their actions, including the king's father and other people involved. The behavior of officials such as the king's father is not only suspected of violating civil laws and administrative laws such as education, but is also suspected of violating civil servant discipline and criminal laws such as using power for personal gain and bribery. It can be seen that this act of impersonation is suspected of infringing on Luo Caixia's right to name, examination and admission rights, as well as various legal interests such as the order of national education examinations, the order of national official document and file management, party member discipline, and civil servant discipline. Therefore, as far as the Luo Caixia incident is concerned, Luo Caixia’s rights, national education and examination order, media reporting rights, civil servant discipline, and intra-party discipline of the ruling party are all interests that should be protected by the law, and only Wang Jiajun, his daughter, and others’ fraud Interests, favors and face interests are the interests that should not be protected the most. And always paying attention to the legitimacy and legality of various interests has become the primary issue faced by legislation, law enforcement, judicial and law-abiding activities in our era of diversified interests. Luo Caixia has set an example for tens of millions of candidates to fight for fair rights to education with her brave prosecution. Judges who are proficient in the law and have jurisdiction should consider the social impact of this case, further improve the efficiency of litigation, and more consciously assume their responsibilities. assume the responsibility for realizing fairness and justice. More importantly, college students have dual identities during a specific period of receiving higher education. First, they are citizens of the country, and second, they are citizens receiving education in schools. Therefore, college students enjoy not only the general legal rights that they should enjoy as citizens, but also the special legal rights that they should enjoy as educated persons. The rights of college students are granted by national laws and regulations and are protected by law. The legality of the rights and interests of college students not only requires college students to realize their legitimate rights and interests in accordance with the law; it also requires colleges and universities to protect and realize the legitimate rights and interests of college students, including students’ right to educational relief, in education management. There are two main ways to remedy the rights of college students, one is administrative relief, and the other is judicial relief. Universities are legal persons, but when authorized by laws, regulations or entrusted by administrative agencies to exercise administrative powers, they can also assume the role of administrative subjects. They should also follow the basic principles and procedures of administrative law. The management relationship between universities and students is a Special administrative relationships should be included in the scope of administrative litigation. However, so far, there is still no law or effective judicial interpretation that clearly stipulates the qualifications of defendants in administrative litigation in colleges and universities. This has become the direct reason why many courts still do not accept such administrative cases, and has become an important factor for current students to seek justice when their rights are violated. An important obstacle to relief. The management of student status, academic qualifications and degrees by colleges and universities involves the most important rights of students. A citizen who is fined for violating traffic regulations can file an administrative lawsuit, but when the most important rights of a student are involved, he cannot file an administrative lawsuit. This seems a bit Incomprehensible. The law should clearly stipulate the adjustment of this social relationship, that is, giving educated people more ways to relieve themselves. Applying judicial procedures to resolve disputes over the rights of college students can effectively supervise colleges and universities' exercise of management powers conferred by laws and regulations in accordance with the law, which is conducive to resolving conflicts between students and colleges and universities and maintaining social stability. In the rule of administrative law, in addition to obtaining relief through administrative litigation, administrative counterparts can also protect their rights and interests through another subsequent relief channel - administrative reconsideration. Administrative reconsideration is the main administrative relief channel in my country, and it is also the supervision and error correction mechanism within the administrative system. Administrative review is very beneficial for students in the relative position to seek legal relief. It can not only reduce the burden of litigation on all parties, but also ensure the continuity and stability of administrative order. In order to end the current situation where colleges and universities have no remedy for infringement, an educational administrative review system should be established as soon as possible and educational administrative actions should be clearly stipulated in the administrative litigation law.

Only in this way can colleges and universities be subject to the basic principles of administrative law and administrative procedures when making decisions that have a significant impact on the counterparty, as well as the supervision of the superior education administrative department and the judicial review of judicial organs; and only in this way can universities not As for allowing colleges and universities to arbitrarily infringe on the basic rights of educated people, only then can the smooth realization of the principle of administrative rule of law be ensured.