Accountants and tax agents are close and professional, and the professional knowledge applied in the work is relatively inflexible and stable. With the increase of work experience, the application of work experience is relatively stable, and the professional knowledge has not changed much, which is suitable for stable people. Lawyers, on the other hand, need to master constantly changing professional knowledge and have strong flexibility. Work experience will only affect their work ability, but it has little effect on their work level. Rich professional knowledge, intelligent mind and sharp tongue are their main prerequisites, which are suitable for challenging people.

Second, look at economic income.

Under normal circumstances, a better accountant and tax agent has a moderate income. Because of the nature of his work, he is down-to-earth and not challenging. Therefore, starting a firm is the greatest success, so the economic income is not much higher.

Lawyers, however, are extremely challenging. If the business they accept is trivial, it will be similar to the income of ordinary people. Lawyers' main income comes from economic disputes. How big the lawsuit is, whether they win or lose, which directly affects his income, and its explosiveness is incomparable to accountants.

Third, look at social status.

Accountants and tax agents, no matter how capable they are, dare not go beyond the constraints of the law, so their clients are limited and their social status is average, so they can only be regarded as white-collar worker; Lawyers, on the other hand, are different. If they are competent, they can argue with the law and have a prominent social position, and they will be sought after. They may be gray collars or gold collars.