Accurately identify false accusations and frame-ups. The "Rules" stipulate that "it is a false accusation to reflect the problem by fabricating facts, forging materials, etc., with the intention of causing others to suffer adverse political influence, loss of reputation or accountability." A clear definition of false accusation and frame-up is conducive to guiding the accuser to supervise in an orderly manner according to law and objectively and truly reflect the situation. First, carefully identify, judge, report and accuse the contents. For the received report and complaint materials, the complaint reporting department can judge the report and complaint content by contacting and verifying the complainant and comparing the big data of the report platform, so as to make the first pass. The supervision and inspection department shall, in combination with the daily supervision, screen and verify the clues. The second is to accurately distinguish between false accusation and false accusation. The behavior of false accusation and frame-up emphasizes subjective intention, and mainly fabricates the facts of violation of discipline and law by means of making things out of nothing, planting and framing, distorting the facts, and reversing black and white. However, if there is no intention to frame others subjectively, and it is an accusation that you don't know the truth and believe others' rumors by mistake, it should be considered as a false accusation and can't be treated as a false accusation.

Seriously investigate and punish false accusations and frame-ups. After screening and judging, it belongs to false accusation and frame-up, and the discipline inspection and supervision organs should deal with it seriously according to the rules and regulations, especially for those who have bad means, caused adverse effects, seriously interfered with the general election or the selection and appointment of cadres, and still falsely accused and framed others after investigation, forcing and instigating others to falsely accuse and frame-up, they should be dealt with severely. First, crack down on false accusations and frame-ups according to rules and regulations. According to different situations such as the identity of the person who falsely accused and framed, and the consequences caused, the behavior of falsely accused and framed was classified and investigated. Strengthen the connection and cooperation with personnel departments, public security organs and judicial organs, establish a clue transfer mechanism, and do a good job in handling false accusations and frame-ups. The second is to increase the exposure of typical cases. For government functionaries, it can be conducted in the form of internal meetings and documents. For typical cases of false accusation and frame-up with bad nature and bad influence, it can also be conducted through the official website of discipline inspection and supervision organs, WeChat WeChat official account, mobile phone clients and news media. The third is to correct improper interests in time. The discipline inspection and supervision organs shall advise the relevant organizations, departments and units to correct the positions, ranks, professional titles, academic qualifications, degrees, awards and qualifications obtained through false accusations.

Clarify the facts and motivate people to act. Establish and improve the clarification mechanism, incorporate clarification into the important content of supervision and discipline enforcement, and carry out it according to the rules and regulations. The first is to clarify the facts and eliminate the influence. If the discipline inspection and supervision organ verifies that the accusation is inaccurate and it is necessary to clarify it, it will be clarified by means of sending a letter, face-to-face explanation and notification after approval; The discipline inspection and supervision organs shall make corrections within the scope of their functions and powers, or put forward rectification suggestions to the competent authorities. The second is to grasp the content of clarification. Clarification only focuses on the specific problems in false reports, and does not make a comprehensive evaluation of the clarified objects. It is necessary to clarify the purpose and scope of the problem, and make clear the contents of false accusations, rather than comprehensively affirming or endorsing the work of the reported cadres or the situation of clean politics. Third, do a good job in ideological and political work. For party member cadres who have been falsely accused and framed, the discipline inspection and supervision organs and the party organizations of their units should actively carry out ideological and political work, have heart-to-heart talks, eliminate worries, help those who have been falsely accused and framed to unload their ideological burdens, eliminate negative effects, protect their entrepreneurial enthusiasm, and promote their duties and responsibilities. Some discipline inspection and supervision organs pay a return visit to the cadres who have been falsely accused and framed. By listening to the thoughts of the clarified cadres, the opinions of colleagues in the unit and the reflection of the masses, they can see the mental outlook, performance and work performance of the clarified cadres, fully understand and master the true performance of the clarified cadres, let them feel the trust and concern from the organization, and condense the positive energy of the cadres.