Do not participate, democratic evaluation is generally presided over by the inspection team. Generally, written evaluation is adopted, and participants are invited to evaluate the performance of the object of investigation in terms of morality, ability, diligence, performance and honesty according to specific evaluation items and a certain score, or directly evaluate the object of investigation in the order of excellent, competent, basically competent or incompetent.

First, the main problems of democratic evaluation in the traditional way

1, the workload is huge. Under the traditional manual mode, the workload of democratic evaluation is huge, especially the statistics and analysis of evaluation results take a lot of time and need to be completed in a short time.

2. Efficiency is difficult to improve. The new system puts forward more detailed requirements for democratic evaluation. If the traditional manual method is continued, efficiency improvement will become the bottleneck of refined operation.

Second, successful cases

1 * * There were 98 people in this democratic evaluation, and 3,625 evaluation forms were collected by * * *, which realized the automatic counting results of votes within half a day and formed various analysis charts.

2. Through the application of this democratic evaluation system, the traditional manual statistical human resource management method has been changed by means of information technology, which greatly improves the work efficiency, expands the analysis dimension, ensures the openness, transparency and objectivity of democratic evaluation, and provides strong data support for the company's human resource decision-making and cadre team construction.

3. Application of democratic evaluation by Guangzhou State Taxation Bureau

Third, the definition and discrimination of related concepts

First, the concept of party and government leading cadres and its importance

Second, democratic evaluation and related concepts

Legal basis:

"China * * * production party branch work regulations (Trial)"

Article 18

Generally, the Party branch conducts 1 democratic appraisal of party member every year, and organizes party member to analyze the party spirit against the qualified party member standard and the pledge of joining the Party, in connection with personal reality. The Party branch convened the general party membership meeting in accordance with the procedures of personal self-evaluation, party member mutual evaluation and democratic evaluation.