On the morning of February 3, 65438, the case of the sinking of the toilet in Korla, Xinjiang was retried and pronounced in the court of the Second Agricultural Division of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps. Defendant Li Jiangong was imprisoned for nearly 12 years, and was acquitted and released in court. According to a large amount of information provided by Li Jiangong defender Wang Shihua, the court ruled that Li Jiangong's guilty statement and his daughter Li Juan's testimony during the police interrogation were illegal evidence and excluded them.

Not guilty after being detained for nearly 12 years for sinking a corpse in a toilet: Wang, the complaint agent, vowed to complain outside Huating. Respondents provide photos. "I am very happy." In the afternoon, when Li Jiangong was interviewed by The Paper, he was still very excited. After his release, he met his parents and other relatives and "talked a lot". Li Jiangong said that compared with before the prison was built, many buildings were built in Korla, which widened the road. /kloc-It's strange to see this city again after 0/2 years.

Referring to his 12 prison work experience, Li Jiangong revealed to The Paper that he would apply for state compensation and hold the relevant personnel accountable. As for the longer-term life planning, Li Jiangong said that he has no plans for the time being. "I'm over 50 years old, old, my legs and feet are uncomfortable and I can't move easily. I can't find a job outside. Only stay at home. " Li Jiangong said that he would have a good rest at home next.

According to the acquittal, Wang Shihua applied for the exclusion of illegal evidence, excluding 17 interrogation transcripts formed by Li Jiangong's confession in the investigation stage, 2 interrogation transcripts formed in the examination and prosecution stage, and 5 interrogation transcripts formed by witness Li Juan in the investigation stage. There is evidence in the case file that the evidence was illegally collected and should be excluded. After obtaining the above-mentioned evidence, the public prosecution organ agrees to the application for the exclusion of illegal evidence put forward by the defender, and considers the above-mentioned evidence illegal and should be excluded.

The court held that the cause, motive, purpose, scene, tools and other key evidence of this case were rejected, and the indictment accused Li Jiangong of intentional homicide. The facts were unclear and the evidence was insufficient, so the court refused to support it. The public prosecution organ appeared in court, and the public prosecution opinion held that the case did not meet the legal proof standard of reliable and sufficient evidence.