However, the realization environment of tax-related issues is quite complicated. Chinese characters have profound connotations, and the meanings expressed by different combinations may be completely different, and different people understand them from different angles. The language in the network environment has some limitations in expression. It is not that taxpayers can express the essence of tax-related issues clearly on the Internet in a few words. Because taxpayers' statements and explanations on tax-related issues are unclear and incomplete, State Taxation Administration of The People's Republic of China's answers to this question may be misunderstood and biased, thus misleading relevant taxpayers.
A group of people and organizations with ulterior motives deliberately set up language traps when consulting questions, and deliberately failed to fully explain tax-related issues and environmental conditions in advance, so as to mislead and lure State Taxation Administration of The People's Republic of China into presenting what he needed in his reply, and achieve the purpose of ulterior motives.
In recent years, State Taxation Administration of The People's Republic of China found that some people or institutions used the authority of the State Administration of Taxation to interpret tax clauses, misleading and inducing State Taxation Administration of The People's Republic of China to put forward what he needed in his reply, so as to confront local tax authorities and achieve ulterior motives. Therefore, Lan Song, deputy director in charge of this work in State Taxation Administration of The People's Republic of China, particularly emphasized that State Taxation Administration of The People's Republic of China's reply to tax consultation questions on his website should not be used as the basis for tax enforcement by local tax authorities, and the specific procedures and related matters shall be subject to tax laws and regulations and local tax authorities.
At the same time, in order to avoid being used by people and institutions with ulterior motives to the maximum extent, State Taxation Administration of The People's Republic of China strengthened the expression of tax principles in his reply. Except for some * * * hot issues, all others are answered by "one-on-one" private messages, and these tax consultation questions are no longer publicly released.
Therefore, in the face of State Taxation Administration of The People's Republic of China's reply to tax consultation questions on its website, we should strengthen rational analysis and judgment according to tax laws and regulations, and don't be misled, resulting in tax risks and economic losses.