Current location - Loan Platform Complete Network - Local tax - What violations of discipline and discipline do township leading cadres generally have?
What violations of discipline and discipline do township leading cadres generally have?
First, the characteristics and laws of grassroots cadres' violations of law and discipline.

1, the total number of letters and visits at the grassroots level is increasing. From the analysis of the contents of the report, the first three years mainly reflected the economic problems such as unreasonable housing charges for farmers, chaotic financial management at village level, and even the establishment of off-balance-sheet accounts. At present, after a period of centralized management, such problems have been significantly improved. From 20 1 1 to 20 13, with the promotion of urban construction and the increase of funds allocated by higher authorities for the construction of agriculture, rural areas and farmers, they bought and sold privately.

2. Cases in key areas such as people's livelihood demolition are prone to occur frequently. Mainly manifested in some departments undertaking livelihood projects and some village cadres embezzling and misappropriating various funds for benefiting farmers, defrauding subsistence allowances, disaster relief funds, land compensation funds and poverty alleviation funds. Farmers and suburban residents deliberately build or build illegal buildings to extract government funds for demolition, and even the relevant departments condone and cover up the above behaviors in the demolition and resettlement projects. On August 20 12, the district commission for discipline inspection investigated and dealt with a case in which the director of a village Committee hindered public law enforcement because of unauthorized construction. In the name of rebuilding old houses and dangerous houses, the director of the village committee built illegal buildings without the approval of the town and planning department. In this process, the township inspectors repeatedly discouraged illegal construction, went to the door to carry out ideological work and took warning to dismantle it, but it didn't play any role. Knowing that there were illegal buildings, the comrade repeatedly advised him not to change and went his own way, and his behavior constituted a mistake that hindered the social management order. In the end, the discipline inspection department gave him serious disciplinary action.

It triggered many people's petitions. Economic crimes such as corruption and bribery of rural cadres have seriously restricted the development of village-level collective economy. Coupled with the influence of grassroots rural family forces, it is most likely to arouse public anger, cause tension between cadres and the masses, trigger group petitions, and even collective visits and leapfrog visits, which seriously affect rural social stability. Judging from the situation of letters and visits in recent years, some villages that investigate and deal with cases of village cadres violating laws and regulations are basically key villages for people to petition.

4. It is difficult to find clues, and it is difficult to investigate and collect evidence. Nowadays, a large number of young people with knowledge, consciousness and understanding of policies in rural areas go out to work, and even if they want to report, they give up reporting because it takes time and effort to affect their work. Some people are afraid to report the threat and revenge of "clan forces". Although someone reported it, the clues were unclear, the content was not specific, or the problem was reflected for a long time, which made it impossible to investigate. Some of the people involved or insiders are migrant workers, and they go out to work most of the time, so it is difficult to cooperate with evidence collection.

5. The means of committing crimes are complex and diverse. On the economic side, the main manifestations of violating discipline and law are: corruption, interception, private distribution, land compensation, disaster relief, poverty alleviation and other funds and materials; Public funds are kept privately or lent to others for interest, or lent to relatives and friends; Illegal possession of collective assets during the disposal of collective assets such as enterprise restructuring and asset transfer; Financial management confusion, eating and drinking profligacy, discretionary spending, etc.

Second, the analysis of the causes of frequent cases of violation of discipline and law by rural grassroots cadres.

1, cadres' educational level and comprehensive quality are low. Judging from the village cadres who have been put on file for investigation in the past five years, most of them have a low education level, with only 9 people with college education or above, 23 people with high school education and technical secondary school education, and 29 people with junior high school education or below. Shallow cultural literacy leads grassroots cadres to ignore the study of policy theory, the change of outlook on life and values, little knowledge of the policies, systems and laws of the party and the country, and weak awareness of discipline and law, which leads some cadres to be unaware that they have violated party discipline and state law when they are investigated.

2. "Last time" is serious. Most of the cadres who were investigated showed their psychology and motivation when they broke the law, from initial fear to later enjoyment, so that they could not extricate themselves. In the process of committing crimes, most people think that their actions are very hidden and will not be discovered. Some people often have the mentality of "one last time" and will not do it next time, but they can't stop.

3. Poor treatment leads to psychological imbalance. The treatment of some rural grassroots cadres is generally low. With the introduction of a series of national policies to strengthen agriculture and benefit farmers, a large number of funds to support agriculture and benefit farmers flock to rural areas. Faced with such a large piece of low-wage cake, some rural grassroots cadres, driven by unbalanced psychology, took risks and violated party discipline and state laws.

4. There is a serious lack of supervision. Due to the lack of full-time staff, weak strength and much work in the center, the township discipline inspection commission cannot supervise the village cadres. When villages and towns promote and appoint village cadres, they lack a set of mature inspection and assessment mechanisms, especially on political issues, which emphasize local "influence" and "driving force" of work. In this way, some people with powerful clan forces entered the ranks of cadres, and the masses did not dare to speak out about the behavior of village cadres, and their supervision was weak.

5. Grassroots discipline inspection cadres are "unable" to handle cases. At present, there are 18 full-time discipline inspection cadres in 9 township sub-district offices in Xinzhou District. Due to frequent changes in the staff of the grassroots discipline inspection commission and lack of experience, it is impossible to handle cases. In the process of handling cases, there are too many human contacts and greetings at different levels, and external interference factors seriously affect the handling of cases, so that the Commission for Discipline Inspection has no courage to handle cases.

6. It is difficult to find clues, and it is difficult to investigate and collect evidence. At present, a large number of young people in rural areas who are knowledgeable, conscious and understand policies go out to work. Even if you want to report, you give up reporting because it takes time and effort to affect your work. Some people are afraid to report the threat and revenge of "clan forces". Although someone reported it, it was impossible to investigate because the clues were unclear, the content was not specific, or the problem was reflected for a long time. Some people involved or insiders are migrant workers, who spend most of their time working outside the home, so it is difficult to cooperate with evidence collection. In addition, the means of investigating and handling cases by grassroots disciplinary committees are simple and limited, and the measures are single, so some difficult and complicated cases are difficult to handle.

Three, some suggestions on doing a good job in handling cases at the grass-roots level

Grass-roots cadres directly deal with the masses, and their violations of discipline and law occur in front of the masses, which has a very strong impact and negative effect. If not investigated and corrected in time, it will seriously affect the image of the party Committee and government. Therefore, it is necessary to intensify the investigation. Therefore, the following suggestions are put forward:

(A) to the rural grassroots cadres "brain".

The frequent violations of discipline and law by party member cadres at the rural grassroots level are not unrelated to their low cultural level, lack of political concepts and legal awareness. Therefore, strengthening the policy theory study and education of rural grassroots cadres and comprehensively improving the quality of cadres in party member are the fundamental measures to effectively curb the phenomenon of party member, a rural grassroots cadre, breaking the law. According to the cultural level and work practice of grassroots cadres, we should flexibly adopt easy-to-accept and easy-to-understand educational forms, conduct regular and irregular political and ideological and professional training, and improve the comprehensive quality of village cadres. It is necessary to give full play to the role of warning education bases at all levels, use typical cases and carry out warning education in a planned way.

(two) to the grassroots discipline inspection departments "calcium".

Transfer the human, financial and property rights of the grassroots discipline inspection department to the vertical management of the county discipline inspection commission and implement the stationed system. Strengthen the construction of grassroots discipline inspection committees, and each township is equipped with a certain number of full-time discipline inspection cadres. It is necessary to earnestly implement the stipulation that the secretary of the township discipline inspection commission is not in charge of other work unrelated to the discipline inspection work, and liberate the grassroots discipline inspection cadres from complicated affairs. Implement the tenure system for grassroots discipline inspection cadres, especially the secretary of the discipline inspection commission, and establish a relatively fixed team of discipline inspection cadres to avoid the regular flow of discipline inspection cadres. Efforts should be made to improve the influence and execution of grassroots discipline inspection departments, and to give grassroots discipline inspection committees greater decision-making power and discretion than local party committees and governments.

(3) It is necessary to increase support for grassroots discipline inspection departments in handling cases. Strengthen the support for the equipment needed for handling cases at the grassroots level, equipped with computers, cameras, voice recorders, etc. Strengthen the guidance of handling cases in township sub-district offices, regularly carry out case-handling exchange activities, organize personnel to go deep into the grassroots to assist in handling difficult and complicated cases, help them grasp the policy boundaries, improve the handling methods and improve the handling level. Attach importance to the role of case-handling cooperation zones and organize cases in different places between towns and villages. It is necessary to help grassroots case handlers put on "iron shirts" and "golden bells", take the initiative to remove the resistance to handling cases for grassroots discipline inspection departments, and resolutely stop the "wind of intercession." Those who deliberately obstruct the case handling or retaliate against the case-handling personnel will be dealt with seriously and will not be tolerated.

(four) the implementation of grassroots rural cadres economic responsibility audit system. It is an effective form of supervision to audit the economic responsibility of party member cadres at the grass-roots level in rural areas, which is conducive to discovering the loopholes and deficiencies in the financial management of village-level organizations, avoiding causing greater losses to the collective, discovering the shortcomings and mistakes of village cadres in time, and educating and protecting cadres to the maximum extent. Especially for the village party secretary and village director, the responsibility audit should be carried out before, during and after appointment. The key contents of the audit mainly include the basic situation of financial management, the construction of financial system, the implementation of financial laws and regulations, the disposal of collective assets that farmers are concerned about, the management of creditor's rights and debts, land contracting, the management of special funds, and financial disclosure. The audit results should be widely publicized in the village and incorporated into the integrity files of village cadres as the basis for continued appointment in the future.

(five) to carry out the "sunshine rural project" construction. Formulate unified standards and make detailed provisions on the contents, forms, time intervals, inspection and evaluation methods and accountability of village affairs disclosure. Set up a fixed publicity column in a place where villagers' activities are concentrated and the location is obvious, which is convenient for villagers to read. Public projects should include

Family planning, relief, subsistence allowances, special care, funeral reform, etc. Can be extended to the openness of party affairs. Establish and improve the supervision committee and democratic financial management team, and publish the contents of village affairs disclosure after deliberation by the supervision committee, and formulate and introduce a series of systems such as village cadres' outgoing audit, village affairs disclosure, and rural collective funds, assets and resources management. It is necessary to actively innovate the means and forms of open and democratic management of village affairs, continuously enhance the breadth and depth of open village affairs, promote "sunshine village affairs construction", deepen grassroots democratic management, protect farmers' right to know, make decisions, participate and supervise, and strive to promote the institutionalization, standardization and proceduralization of rural grassroots democracy.

(6) Intensify the investigation and punishment of disciplinary cases. It is necessary to focus on investigating and handling cases of cadres violating discipline and law in rural grassroots party member, resolutely investigate and deal with cases involving the interests of the masses, and highlight the investigation of "seven categories" of cases. First, investigate and deal with cases of violation of discipline and law in the process of building houses by farmers. Seriously investigate and deal with violations of laws and regulations such as illegal land grant and taking cards in the process of obtaining permits. The second is to highlight the investigation and handling of cases that undermine the national policy of benefiting farmers. Seriously investigate and deal with violations of policies such as subsidies and compensation for benefiting farmers, and seriously investigate and deal with violations of laws and regulations in the implementation of policies supporting agriculture such as transfer payment, poverty alleviation and development, and support from rural economic cooperative organizations, and make efforts to investigate and deal with violations of laws and regulations in the implementation of policies such as compulsory education, cooperative medical care, and special care and assistance to ensure that all policies benefiting farmers and benefiting the people are put in place. The third is to highlight the investigation and handling of cases of violation of discipline and law in engineering construction. Strengthen the supervision of "new rural construction", "village to village" project, rural safe drinking water project, construction of irrigation and water conservancy facilities, renovation of dilapidated buildings in primary and secondary schools and other projects, regularly carry out project fund operation and quality and safety law enforcement inspection and supervision, and immediately organize investigation and punishment once clues of violation of discipline and law are found. The fourth is to highlight the investigation and handling of cases of violation of discipline and law in the disposal of collective assets. In-depth development of rural collective assets, resources, funds and other "three-capital clean-up", resolutely investigate and deal with all kinds of violations of discipline and law in rural "three-capital" management, and maintain the order of rural economic management. The fifth is to highlight the investigation and handling of cases of misconduct and abuse of power by grassroots cadres. Seriously investigate and deal with cases of misuse and abuse of rights to enrich themselves and seek benefits, and seriously investigate and deal with violations and damages of farmers' land contractual management rights, land circulation freedom rights, villagers' autonomy and participation rights and the legitimate rights and interests of migrant workers. The sixth is to highlight the investigation and handling of grassroots cadres involved in black cases. Focus on cracking down on cases of violation of discipline and law, such as safeguarding clan and family power, suppressing farmers' good wishes to express their opinions, retaliating against the masses, illegally organizing and planning, manipulating group events behind the scenes, engaging in unorganized activities, and interfering with and destroying grassroots general elections.