Insufficient control over people returning from overseas, omissions in nucleic acid testing, untimely and incomplete flow control, and the lack of attention paid by individual responsible persons to epidemic prevention and control are all omissions in local epidemic prevention work.
The COVID-19 epidemic in Suining City, Sichuan Province has caused a serious outbreak. There have been new cases in the local area for several days. Medium and high-risk areas have emerged. The social epidemic cannot be effectively controlled. Through the investigation of local epidemic prevention and control , found that there are many loopholes in local epidemic prevention and control measures, and the lack of adequate control over people returning from other places is an important omission. With the epidemic spreading across the country, foreigners did not undergo nucleic acid testing in time when they returned to Suining City, failed to conduct health monitoring, and did not conduct centralized quarantine. As a result, foreigners carried the virus and spread it locally, causing the spread of the epidemic.
Omissions and lack of timely nucleic acid testing are also important problems in local epidemic prevention measures. When a confirmed case appeared, the local government failed to carry out nucleic acid testing for all employees. The failure to publicize and manage one person was an important omission of the local epidemic prevention and control department. Only by allowing all employees to participate in nucleic acid testing can we Positive infections were discovered in a timely manner to prevent hidden spread of the epidemic, and these positive infections were centralized and isolated for effective management. However, local nucleic acid testing was not in place, and detections were missed, leading to the rapid spread of the epidemic.
Lack of timely and comprehensive flow control is also an oversight in local epidemic prevention measures. After the emergence of positive infections, although the confirmed infected people were centralized isolated and controlled, the epidemic control was not carried out actively and effectively. The close contact rights of the confirmed patients were not checked, and effective control measures were not taken for those close contacts. As a result, the epidemic continues to spread among these densely populated groups, and there is a risk of large-scale spread and spillover of the epidemic, which increases the pressure on local epidemic prevention and control.
The lack of attention paid by individual responsible persons to epidemic prevention and control is also an important problem in local epidemic prevention. They failed to effectively manage these responsible persons and failed to consolidate their responsibilities, allowing them to neglect their duties during the epidemic prevention and control period. , causing residents of some risk-controlled communities to come and go at will. The existence of this situation also increased the risk of epidemic spread and accelerated the spread of the epidemic. These are all omissions in local epidemic prevention and control measures, and changes and adjustments should be made as soon as possible.