In the civil service examination, important current political hotspots can be divided into five categories: politics, economy, culture, society and ecology, which is the so-called five-in-one construction. In the civil service examination, the accumulation of candidates and their views on hot spots will also be examined.
Understanding current affairs and politics is an essential subject in the civil service examination, especially for candidates who want to get high marks. If you have time, it is recommended to watch news broadcast, focus interview and other programs every day. The time will not be too long, but it will be of great help to the accumulation of materials and the cultivation of language sense.
For an interview, there are nine evaluation elements, among which the comprehensive analysis topics with high frequency are more about the understanding and views on social hot events, phenomena and policies. More needs us to look at the problem from the perspective of the government, think about the problem, be able to have our own judgment on the incident, and have more opinions on the handling of the problem. Based on the introduction of the test content, candidates should also think about whether all news needs to be understood and memorized. In fact, it still depends on the examination situation in each province. Generally speaking, the topic is not particularly difficult. Some provinces pay attention to social issues, while others pay attention to macro issues, often involving political and economic issues. Candidates need to know more about national political issues.
For the interview of national civil servants, it is very important to make full preparations in advance for the success of the interview, especially for the hot issues of current politics. Chinese public education experts hope that everyone can take the initiative and pay enough attention to it.
In the national examination interview, hot issues of current politics can be said to be required answers for various departments, such as national tax, customs, railway police, entry and exit, etc. And the form of questioning is flexible, supplemented by cartoons and videos, but the idea of answering questions is basically the same, so don't worry too much.
Here, I give you a real question, a simple analysis, so that you have a preliminary understanding of this kind of topic:
True question: Now the philanthropy in China is developing well. Some people think that individuals and enterprises that "promise but don't donate" should be exposed; However, some people think that it should not be exposed, and exposure is meaningless. What do you think of this?
Analysis:
This topic belongs to the topic of social phenomena in current political issues, which mainly examines whether candidates' views on some social issues are thorough and comprehensive. As far as this topic is concerned, it is not good to promise without donation, but at the same time, we should also see that it reflects the defects of charity in China at present. Then the ultimate goal of this topic is naturally to strengthen charitable services and eliminate the promise of not donating.
Reference answer:
The behavior of refusing to donate has seriously impacted our traditional moral concepts and the public's trust in charity. I think we should go back to the source and solve this problem fundamentally.
The key words of fraudulent donation and fraudulent donation, promising not to donate, hurt the public's mind, but also impact people's trust in related enterprises, organizations and individuals again and again. Promise not to donate, first of all, because of huge profits. China has always advocated benevolence and righteousness. When enterprises or individuals decide to help the disadvantaged groups, they naturally stand on the moral high ground, and huge advertising effects and market benefits follow. Secondly, the imperfect punishment mechanism makes the cost of promising not to donate too low, which makes unscrupulous enterprises or individuals have time to drill, which is also the main reason why people who write empty checks are common. At present, China has not yet formulated special laws and regulations on fundraising nationwide, and there is a lack of strict legal norms on the phenomenon of promising not to donate.
But at the same time, we should also see that we can't promise without donating across the board. Commitment but not donation also reflects that the construction of charity in China is not perfect enough and needs to be strengthened.
Therefore, in order to fundamentally put an end to the promise of not donating, first of all, it is urgent to complete and improve the relevant legal system. Combined with the current situation in China, relevant specific laws and regulations will be promulgated at an appropriate time, and a supporting standardized punishment mechanism will be established. If the donor fails to fulfill the donation agreement, the fundraiser shall urge him to fulfill it. Secondly, we can learn a lot from the effective practices in the world. For example, the United States has specially set up a principle of "promise and prohibition of going back on our word", that is, we can't go back on our word after making a promise. Finally, it is crucial that the whole society of Qi Xin work together to eradicate the promise and not donate. Once there is a promise not to donate, the whole society will condemn it in public opinion and resist it in action, leaving them nowhere to hide. Only by showing the true and pure kindness and exposing those who pursue fame and fortune under the guise of public welfare to the public, will our charity go further and further on the healthy track.
Finally, I suggest that you pay attention to hot news events in the process of preparing political issues. You can watch more news and TV programs every day, get a deep understanding of the current political comments of mainstream media such as People's Daily, Xinhuanet or Guangming.com, learn to analyze social hot issues from the perspective of the government, and strengthen daily accumulation.