Mutual criticism in 2021
Mutual criticism in 2021. The main purpose of mutual criticism is to make everyone more deeply aware of their own mistakes. After all, it is always difficult for oneself. Understand yourself comprehensively. Let me give you a brief understanding of examples of mutual criticism in 2021. Mutual criticism 1
1. Opinions put forward by Comrade Yang Jinming:
( 1) The branch secretary did not fulfill his duties well, and the education and management of party members was not strict enough.
(2) Theoretical study is not solid enough and proactive enough.
(3) The idea of ??being a good old man is relatively serious. He criticizes his comrades less and praises them more.
(4) The work of cultivating and developing new party members is not done deeply.
2. Opinions raised by Comrade Wang Qing:
(1) The study is not deep, and there is a phenomenon of not taking notes when studying.
(2) The awareness of innovation is not deep
(3) Not paying attention to the way of speaking, making too many jokes and asking few criticisms from comrades.
(4) The awareness of party members has weakened, and party spirit training has been relaxed to a certain extent.
3. Opinions raised by Comrade Zhen Zhen:
(1) The awareness of innovative work is not strong.
(2) The entrepreneurial energy and passion of the officers have diminished.
(3) Party spirit training has been relaxed to a certain extent. The party’s latest theory is not studied enough, the theoretical foundation is not deep, the thinking is rigid, and the concepts are aging, which affects the improvement of work standards.
(4) Emphasize work over study.
(5) Party members do not play their role as role models and provide little help to cadres and party members.
4. Opinions put forward by Comrade Li Dongxi:
(1) Inadequate study of theoretical and business knowledge.
(2) Failure to strengthen self-cultivation according to party member standards.
(3) Organizational discipline is not strong.
5. Comments on Comrade Yang Shengle:
(1) The enterprising spirit and hard-working spirit are not strong, and the work standards are not high.
(2) There are not many methods at work and little thinking about work.
(3) The work initiative is not strong enough.
(4) Not bold enough at work and not responsible enough.
(5) The exemplary role of party members is not enough.
(6) Organizational discipline needs to be improved.
7. Opinions put forward by Comrade Hua Tao:
(1) The "Party Constitution" is not studied enough, there are few exchanges with comrades during study, and there is still a lack of self-improvement. Missing.
(2) Insufficient experience in mass work.
(3) The pioneering spirit is not strong.
(4) Lack of ambition.
8. Opinions put forward by Comrade Huang Qinsheng:
(1) The spirit of enduring hardship is not strong and he occasionally complains.
(2) Active demands for progress are not enough.
(3) Learning is not proactive, comprehensive and thorough enough.
(4) Weak awareness of the overall situation.
(5) The awareness of independent responsibility at work is not strong.
9. Opinions raised by Comrade Ma Shengxiang:
(1) The entrepreneurial enthusiasm of the officers has diminished.
(2) There is a phenomenon of focusing on work and neglecting study.
(3) The awareness of pioneering and innovation is not strong.
(4) Party members do not play their role as role models and provide little help to young party members and cadres.
10. Comments on Comrade Zhao Hongbing:
(1) Not bold and proactive enough in work.
(2) The study is not deep and the study notes are not remembered enough.
(3) Party members do not play their role as role models and provide little help to young cadres.
11. Opinions put forward by Comrade Li Yuhong:
(1) Lack of awareness of initiative and responsibility.
(2) The updating of business knowledge needs to be improved, and there is a phenomenon of focusing on work and neglecting learning.
(3) The work is not meticulous and the sense of innovation is not strong.
(4) Insufficient help for gay relationships.
(5) Organizational discipline has been relaxed, and there are occasional late arrivals and early departures.
(6) There are not many methods at work and it is not flexible enough. Mutual criticism 2
1. Comrade Liu Xiufeng
1. Ineffective supervision and implementation of work. There are too many arrangements and requirements in daily life. Regarding the following implementation, work results, and Not enough attention was paid to promoting measures and too little supervision was given. For example, you emphasized the supervision of labor discipline in the department many times at the meeting, but the implementation was slow and the masses had strong opinions. You said it hard at the meeting, but the implementation was soft, and it felt like thunder but little rain.
2. There is little intervention in some major projects, more listening to reports and reading materials, and less in-depth on-the-spot inspection and guidance. For example, the calculation of department performance without actual research seems to be a muddled practice.
2. Comrade Liu Zhilin
1. He has the egoistic ideas of "keeping himself clean" and "everyone cleans up the snow in front of him". He only seeks to take care of his own affairs and is responsible for Team members are supportive but not proactive.
2. Ineffective supervision of cadres results in leniency and softness.
3. Comrade Bin Zemin
1. He is not down-to-earth enough at work, does not speak the language of the masses, does not put himself on an equal footing to make friends with the masses, and is alienated from the masses. On one level, you can't make love.
2. Problems reported by the masses are mostly solved passively and rarely proactively. Departments are required to solve more problems and problems are solved directly by the masses.