Because it is outrageous to brush a content and completely reverse right and wrong, I took the opportunity to answer the regional attack in Guangzhou anonymously. I found that 33 people like this answer. Some words are really hard to hear, so I will update this answer to refute some opinions that should be answered anonymously.

The main misunderstandings involved in this anonymous answer include:

1. Is there a problem with cities under separate state planning? Since the founding of the People's Republic of China, Guangzhou has been regarded as a city under separate state planning and a provincial capital for many times, which is a problem worthy of study.

Error: Since 1949, the only city in Guangzhou that is listed separately in the plan is 1980~ 1994. Later, cities with separate plans and other cities with separate plans and provincial capitals were cancelled at the same time. Total 15 years, Shenzhen has been a city with separate plans for at least 26 years.

2. Guangzhou people are always crying for poverty, but they ignore the most provincial transfer payments and Guangdong investment projects every year.

Wrong: This view confuses the concepts of tax retention and financial allocation. Judging from the tax retention (available finance), Guangzhou is poor.

The fact that Guangzhou receives the most transfer payments/the most investment projects/the concentration of medical care, universities and transportation resources in the province is the biggest reason why many deep-blown/black-headed people still think that Guangzhou sucks blood even though they know that its financial retention rate is the lowest among major cities in China (provincial capitals, municipalities directly under the Central Government and cities with separate plans). I'll make it clear today.

As shown above, it is a fact that Guangzhou receives the most transfer payments in the province every year. However, in the provincial transfer payment, only 1 100 million yuan of tax refund belongs to Guangzhou's available finance. The other two items: general transfer payment and special transfer payment, which are generally designated purposes and cannot be freely controlled by Guangzhou, are not available finance.

In the same way, Guangdong Province invested projects, and Guangzhou won provincial investment projects, mainly airport and railway-related infrastructure such as Baiyun Airport Terminal and Guangqing Intercity. No matter how much Guangdong investment money these infrastructure projects get, Guangzhou can't get it. Because the finance at this level in Guangzhou cannot be freely controlled.

Tax retention 1 29.8 billion yuan, plus provincial fiscal tax rebate 1 100 million yuan, is1100 million yuan, which is the available finance of Guangzhou in 2026.5438+0. Judging from the available finance, Guangzhou is poor, and there is no crying poverty.

In addition, combined with the original answer of "tax payment/retention of major cities in China in 2020", it can be seen that in addition to the 56 billion yuan paid by Guangfo, Dongguan and Zhu Hui, more than 200 billion yuan of new loans from the provincial finance will be invested in non-Pearl areas, otherwise the annual transfer payment of 300 billion yuan to non-Pearl areas will not be completed.

Of course, under the current circumstances, the annual new loans from the provincial finance are also the bulk of the actual repayment undertaken by Guangfo Guanhuizhu.

Shenzhen spent its own money, not Guangdong's.

Error:

(1) Large-scale projects such as Shenyang-Chongqing Passage are funded by Guangdong Province.

(2) At the request of ZY, the construction of Shenzhen was strongly supported by Guangdong Province, especially in the early stage of the construction of special economic zones. At present, other cities in Guangdong Province are also the largest population sources in Shenzhen, and Dongguan, Guangzhou, Huizhou, Shaoguan and Jieyang are among the top 20 population sources in Shenzhen. Generally speaking, what Shenzhen gets from Guangdong far exceeds the amount of100 ~1600 million yuan paid by Shenzhen as a city with separate plans.

4. The radiation in Shenzhen has promoted the development of Dongguan and Huizhou, while Guangzhou is a vampire.

Error: Dongguan was already one of the "Four Little Tigers in Guangdong" in the early 1980s. Before Shenzhen's industrial spillover, it seized two opportunities, namely, Hong Kong's manufacturing transfer and Taiwanese investment. The industrial spillover of Shenzhen is just icing on the cake for Dongguan.

As for the blood-sucking non-pearl in Guangzhou, it is not worth refuting when there is transfer payment data in this answer.

Based on the principle of friendly answer, I didn't want to write this update, but I really can't accept some deep blowing/killing to raise Shenzhen, ignoring the reality that Guangzhou has a large number of transfer payments all the year round, and conversely, Guangzhou sucks blood.

The original answer is after the dividing line.

Opening warning: This answer is my other answer after browsing this question. I found that when stepping on Guangzhou was politically correct on this platform, some words really didn't sound good, so I wrote them. In order to prevent some people from reading this answer and thinking that Guangzhou sucks blood, this answer will be criticized.

I come from Guangzhou, and my relatives work in Shenzhen. The relevant contents in this answer and my views are only aimed at the current tax situation in Guangzhou and Shenzhen, and have nothing to do with my attitude towards Shenzhen people.

Answer the question first: Shenzhen does not pay taxes to Guangdong Province because Shenzhen is a city with separate plans and enjoys secondary finance.

Shenzhen does not pay taxes to Guangdong Province, which has the greatest impact on Guangdong's development. In the case that Shenzhen, as a city with separate plans, has not paid or underpaid the provincial finance, the biggest source of the provincial finance is Guangzhou, which has brought a long-term and heavy financial burden to Guangzhou. At present, there is no good way to alleviate this situation in the short to medium term.

The above picture (table) shows the tax payment/retention of major cities in China in 2020, or to be precise, cities with a total tax payment of more than 50 billion yuan. This chart was compiled by Guangzhou media and some enthusiastic netizens at the end of 2020, when the status of Guangzhou and Chongqing/Hangzhou as first-tier cities was hotly debated.

As can be seen from the table:

In 2020, Guangzhou's total tax revenue, including paid taxes, will be 446 1 100 million yuan, ranking fourth in the country, matching Guangzhou's status as a first-tier city. At the same time, however, Guangzhou's fiscal retention rate in 2020 is only the lowest among major cities in China (including municipalities directly under the central government, provincial capital cities and accounting vouchers).

In terms of fiscal and tax distribution, Guangzhou is not only the only third-level finance among the four first-tier cities, but also the retention ratio is lower than that of cities in Hangzhou, Nanjing and other provinces that implement second-level finance. The treatment in fiscal and taxation distribution is only the same as Chengdu and Changsha, which is seriously inconsistent with the status of first-tier cities in Guangzhou. Many people don't understand that this is the real "resentment" of Guangzhou people.

Many people, including myself, suddenly found that Guangzhou's financial retention rate is the lowest among major cities in China (including municipalities directly under the central government, provincial capitals and cities with separate plans), and this minimum is not a year or two, but has been the case for 26 years since the reform of the relevant system of 1995. And as long as Guangzhou is still a three-level finance, this situation will not change in the short to medium term.

After dividing the line, refute several common viewpoints on this platform, all of which are related to this problem, and replace a possible sensitive word with pinyin initials:

1. I think that although Shenzhen doesn't pay taxes to Guangdong Province, Shenzhen pays more ZY than Guangzhou does to the province, so it's good that Guangzhou is cheaper.

Judging from the data in the above table, the amount of ZY paid by Shenzhen in 2020 is 409 billion yuan, which is indeed more than the total amount of ZY+ paid by Guangzhou, which is 3 163 billion yuan.

However, Shenzhen's 409 billion yuan includes stamp duty on Shenzhen Stock Exchange transactions. This part of the tax is collected by Shenzhen and will eventually return to ZY, but it will be accounted for in Shenzhen during statistics. In 2020, the total stamp duty on securities will be 654.38+0774 billion yuan. If calculated equally between Shanghai and Shenzhen, the 88.7 billion yuan collected by Shenzhen in that year was the transaction stamp duty collected by Shenzhen Stock Exchange. After deducting this 88.7 billion yuan, the amount paid by Shenzhen is 320.3 billion yuan, which is still more than the total amount paid by Guangzhou to ZY+ Guangdong Province, but the gap is only 4 billion yuan. In other words, Shenzhen pays more taxes than Guangzhou pays ZY+ Guangdong combined, mainly because Shenzhen Stock Exchange collects stamp duty on transactions. After deducting this factor that Shenzhen has but Guangzhou doesn't, the fiscal and tax contributions of Guangzhou and Shenzhen are similar.

2. It is considered that about10 billion yuan in Shenzhen's annual budget is turned over to the provincial quota, so it is not counted as paying taxes to Guangdong.

Simply calculate two formulas:

The annual income of Shenzhen is 65.438+000 billion, which is estimated to be 260 billion in the 26 years from 654.38+0995.

And Guangzhou, 80 billion a year, 26 years is one trillion.

According to the above calculation results, the total amount paid by Shenzhen may actually be less than that paid by Guangzhou)

Well, I believe that most Cantonese people, especially the older generation after 1960s and 1970s, agree that Guangzhou is the provincial capital for a reason. Guangzhou can casually say whether it is blood-sucking or blood transfusion in the province, but it can really be felt in real life.

3. It is considered that Guangzhou, as the provincial capital, has gathered resources such as provincial universities and hospitals, and its income is far greater than the tax of more than 80 billion yuan paid to the province every year. Therefore, Guangzhou is cheap and sells well.

First of all, as the provincial capital, Guangzhou has indeed concentrated resources such as provincial universities and hospitals, but:

1. Provincial universities and medical resources are concentrated in provincial capitals and all provinces, not just Guangzhou.

2. The medical resources located in Guangzhou are open to patients in the whole province, South China and even the whole country. In Guangdong province, "if a county-level hospital can't cure it, go to a local hospital; if a local hospital can't cure it, go to a hospital in Guangzhou; most of them can consider giving up treatment" is regarded as * * * knowledge.

As long as the corresponding medical and educational resources finally benefit the whole province, it is understandable that medical and educational resources are concentrated in the provincial capital.

In 2020, as a representative of Guangzhou Municipal People's Congress, Zhong Nanshan once bluntly said: "Guangzhou has a heavy financial burden. Don't cling to the financial gap. We must find a way, such as whether Guangdong Province can collect less taxes in recent years, or whether Shenzhen (at least in recent years) can pay more taxes to the province. "

The Guangdong authorities' reply to the above proposal is to the effect that the financial situation of Guangzhou is well known in the whole province, but whether this situation can be changed (Shenzhen is a city with separate plans) is not up to the province.

I personally saw the above news at the beginning of 202 1. As a Guangzhou native, my first feeling is that Zhong Lao dares to speak. Then, I feel speechless about Shenzhen's theory of turning over the provincial finance to zero all the year round and enjoying a large number of preferential policies for many years.

There are 16 cities under separate state planning. At present, there are only 5 cities in Dalian, Qingdao, Ningbo, Xiamen and Shenzhen.

As far as Shenzhen is concerned, as long as it is not a municipality directly under the Central Government, it is bound to undertake the task of jointly building Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area with Guangzhou. With the future economic development and changes in the situation, Shenzhen cannot always enjoy the treatment of cities under separate state planning, and Guangzhou cannot always bear the lowest financial retention rate among major cities in China. The long-term commitment of any city is not taken for granted.