See how to explain money politics. American elections need a lot of money. But it doesn't mean that you have to have money to get out and be elected or elected. The place to spend money is to let the people of the whole country know about the candidates. Understand his future ruling policy in all directions. Know whether he has this qualification and ability. Look at his past experiences and achievements. The money needs to be spent on hiring professionals (groups) to plan publicity for him: facing the media and the public, arranging election time, visiting big cities and towns across the country (the whole team often lives in a car the size of several buses), and arranging various meetings, mass meetings and venues; Maintain local campaign offices (with the help of many volunteers), local/national newspapers and TV advertisements; Many debates among TV candidates. Various activities, a few months down, not hundreds, tens of millions, difficult. In the 1980s, a billionaire spent tens of millions on his own campaign. But his political views are too poor and his ability is insufficient. The people didn't know what his political thoughts were, and he lost the election with poor votes. This is why there should be democracy or party support. People who want to be elected don't need to be rich (before President Clinton was elected, his salary as a governor was not as good as that of his lp Hillary as a lawyer). If the parties support it, they can get funds (donated by companies, organizations, individuals, funds, etc.). ) through public support for the parties. The media and the tax bureau closely monitor the use of such political contributions. When they smell a little abuse, they will try to dig. Any candidate who touches the net is definitely black and blue. Yes, the American election needs money, and no money is enough. But not with money (national election, bribe who? )。 Interest groups that make political contributions will certainly have an impact on the future president-elect. But at the same time, because they have a successful career (capable people) or represent some large groups, they can get so much money, which represents many people in a certain field (large groups). This is definitely not a 100% utopian democratic election, but I wonder if there is a better and time-tested method in the world.