The joint meeting system of economic responsibility audit is an effective management mechanism of economic responsibility audit for many years. This year, Licang District of Qingdao revised the joint meeting system of economic responsibility audit, adjusted the members of the leading group of the joint meeting, and further standardized the work from the aspects of leadership mechanism, responsibility mechanism and working mechanism.
In terms of leadership mechanism, the leading group of the joint meeting of economic responsibility audit is responsible for the economic responsibility audit of leading cadres in the whole region and the application of audit results, appropriately adjusting the members of functional departments such as the District Commission for Discipline Inspection, the Organization Department of the District Party Committee, the District Supervision Bureau and the District Audit Bureau, and improving and perfecting the operational guarantee mechanism of the decision-making level of the leading group, the application level of the results of the joint meeting member units, the actual operation level of the audit institutions and the organization and coordination level of the joint office of economic responsibility audit. In the responsibility mechanism, the audit objectives, tasks and responsibilities are quantitatively decomposed into all members of the leading group item by item, and coordination and close cooperation are strengthened to ensure that all work is implemented and achieved practical results; In terms of working mechanism, actively adapt to the needs of the situation and tasks, strengthen the system construction, and revise and improve the system measures such as the Joint Meeting System of Economic Responsibility Audit of Leading Cadres in Licang District and the Economic Responsibility Audit Evaluation Measures of Leading Cadres in Licang District (Trial), which laid the institutional foundation for further standardizing economic responsibility audit behavior and realizing quality assurance and promotion. By organically combining organizational supervision, discipline inspection supervision and economic supervision, we have corrected the problems found in the audit, formed a relatively perfect institutional supervision mechanism, and created a regular management supervision platform for leading cadres and a platform for monitoring and restricting power and preventing abuse of power from the mechanism.