I believe that candidates who have participated in structured interviews will more or less encounter problems that are not answered well in the interview. It's just that the severity of each candidate is different, because each candidate's knowledge and methods are different. Fluency will greatly affect the overall performance and score of candidates, which is the most direct and intuitive performance of candidates in the examiner interview. In fact, it is to examine a candidate's expressive ability, knowledge literacy and psychological quality. Candidates must solve the fluency problem according to their own reasons. Chinese public education shares the following experiences here to help candidates break through the "blocking point" problem.

First, develop good expression habits.

Good expression habits are synchronized with thinking and expression, that is, thinking and answering, rather than "thinking and answering or thinking a little" as some candidates think. This requires that candidates' speech speed should be coordinated with the rhythm of thinking reaction, and their thinking should not be too fast. Otherwise, answering questions is easy to jump, leading to unclear logic and too fast expression. Otherwise, it is easy to have debris and blockage. Candidates are advised to practice more at ordinary times, and can solve the problem that their thinking and expression are out of sync through such things as "speaking", "telling stories" and "making reports".

Second, expand the scope of knowledge.

As the saying goes, "A clever woman can't cook without rice." If candidates want to answer an interview question smoothly, it is essential to accumulate relevant knowledge. To this end, Chinese public education actively increases the content of "high-frequency test sites" for candidates in the course to help candidates improve their knowledge literacy. With a considerable amount of knowledge accumulation, on the one hand, it can improve the understanding ability of candidates, on the other hand, it can learn or quote knowledge. Therefore, before preparing for each interview, candidates should actively keep in mind the key knowledge they often examine in this position in order to be comfortable in the examination room.

Third, master the skills and methods of expression.

Methods and techniques can help candidates break through learning difficulties faster and more efficiently, master certain expression skills and methods, effectively relieve tension or reflect the fluency of answering questions when thinking on the spot is slow. Combined with the author's own practice and experience, the general candidates can adopt the following methods, such as: example, synonymous transformation, positive and negative analysis, corresponding surface analysis, degree analysis and so on. Through these methods, you can effectively alleviate the embarrassment of your poor answer, and even add points to your answer, which is more natural and flexible.

Of course, the most important thing here is that candidates must examine the questions and make clear the purpose and focus of the exam. The answer to any question cannot deviate from the meaning of the question. In addition to clarifying the direction and focus of the answer, you can then justify yourself.