Current location - Loan Platform Complete Network - Local tax - Solve several international trade case analysis problems
Solve several international trade case analysis problems
1, the seller will deliver 9500m/t. Since the contract price remains unchanged and there are no special provisions, the seller can sell the remaining goods to other guests at a higher price. From the buyer's standpoint, the "buyer's option" should be stipulated, that is, the increase or decrease of goods is decided by the buyer.

2. Both losses will be paid by the insurance company, that is, the compensation is 10 100 USD. The loss of $8,000 is part of the loss caused by the accident, which belongs to the compensation scope of FPA; The loss of 2 100 is "all or part of the loss caused by natural disasters in the event of an accident", which is also within the compensation scope of FPA.

This is not a CIF contract. Under the CIF contract, the seller performs the obligation of symbolic delivery. Even if the delivery obligation has been fulfilled, the seller has no obligation to load the goods on the ship bound for the designated destination port at the designated port of shipment. This contract requires the seller to ensure that it will arrive at the port of destination no later than 12, and it is not a CIF contract.

4. Yes. According to Article 15 of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, if the withdrawal notice reaches the offeree before or at the same time as the offer.

It is reasonable for banks to do so. According to article 4 of UCP600, the bank's commitment to the obligations under the letter of credit is not affected by any request or defense made by the applicant based on its relationship with the beneficiary. The quality of the goods is not in conformity with the contract, which is a matter for the buyer and the seller, not the bank.

6. Company A is reasonable. Because company B changed the time of shipment in the offer, from two months after receiving the letter of credit to immediate shipment, the validity of the original offer was terminated. Company A does not accept the conditions of Company B (immediate delivery), and the contractual relationship between the two parties is not established.