Legal analysis: the bank and address of the special VAT invoice are wrong, and it can still be used. If it doesn't exceed the billing month, it is suggested to take back the invoice copy and deduction copy and issue a correct invoice again.

The account opening bank and address are wrong, which does not belong to the ciphertext or two-dimensional code data item generated by the encryption of the special VAT invoice, and has no influence on the ciphertext decryption. Therefore, if the bank and address of the special VAT invoice are wrong, it can be authenticated.

Legal basis: Article 20 of the Notice of State Taxation Administration of The People's Republic of China, People's Republic of China (PRC) on Amending the Provisions on the Use of Special VAT Invoices (Guo Shui Fa [2006] 156) shall be regarded as an invalid condition as mentioned in these Provisions:

(1) The receipt and payment time of the returned invoice shall not exceed the month when the seller issues the invoice;

(two) the seller did not copy the tax and did not keep an account;

(3) The purchaser is not authenticated or the authentication result is that the taxpayer identification number is inconsistent with the authentication, and the special invoice code and number are inconsistent with the authentication.