As we all know, to be among the ranks of civil servants, we must pass two cruel and severe tests: written test and interview. If the written examination of civil servants is a "qualification contest", which proves that the candidates who have passed the examination already have the basic ability and quality of a civil servant, then the interview of civil servants is a "knockout" and a process of "selecting the best from the best". Every candidate who enters the interview is very strong, and the first three to five out of hundreds are outstanding. So, is it a leap or a cliff to finally enter the interview? How do you choose?

The gap between the candidates is narrowing. Interview training can obviously improve the quality of candidates. The answer may be different. The competition in the interview market has become fierce. Let's talk about the two overlords of the civil service training market: Tuhua education VS Chinese public education. When Tuhua Education took the lead in launching the interview course of special post training, Zhonggong Education subsequently launched the professional interview course. The same position and the same proportion of enrollment, the full amount of no more than one person. With the refinement, optimization and homogenization of the course, it is time to test the real knife and gun when you walk into the interview examination room, and the result will be known.

We collected the data of class 1564, and finally chose the unified examination as the examination type through screening, because as can be seen from the data, the effects of provincial examination and national examination are basically the same. In the national examination class, we selected 500 classes with a large amount of data (300 written tests and 200 interviews) as samples, almost all of which were graffiti education and Chinese public education. Because we found that many small and medium-sized institutions didn't know their own data when we collected them, many classes lost their data in the end, so we could only get relevant information indirectly from their academic staff. Let's analyze the data:

On the interview pass rate, the national examination position consists of 1:3 and 1:5, which means it takes three or five people to recruit a person to enter the interview. The average pass rate of the national examination interview is Amp=26%. Through the analysis of 200 samples, among them, 120 graffiti data is Amp=58%, and 80 China public data is Amp=46%, which means that the average pass rate of graffiti 120 interview class is 59%, while that of China public is 46%, reaching 53% as a whole, with a relative of 26.