Speaking of the incident, it was a partner dispute case. Zheng, the protagonist of this case, is from Suqian, Jiangsu. He was engaged in liquor sales in his early years. 20 1 1 Partner with others and agree to operate Yanghe Blue Classic Special Distributor, with a total investment of140,000 yuan. After negotiation among the three parties, it is agreed that Chen Mou Lotus will undertake the investment. And agreed that two years later. If Zheng and Liu Mohong propose to withdraw their shares, Lotus must unconditionally return all the share capital in cash, and this event has also been signed and notarized by the three parties.
This is the problem. 14, Zheng was jailed for rape and sentenced to five years and nine months. When he got out of prison, he began to ask Chen Mou for the money. Because there is no reason for this money, Zheng Jianglian and his wife went to court and asked them to return their shares and dividends.
During the trial, Zheng won the case in the first instance of Sheyang Court, and the original judgment was upheld in the second instance. However, in the implementation stage, the court suddenly started a retrial, which made Zheng unacceptable. He thought that in this incident, Sheyang Court was suspected of handling a human case, so he filed a complaint with Sheyang Court. And posted on the Internet to publicly question the Sheyang court, and was administratively detained by the Sheyang court for insulting and defaming 10 day and fined100000 yuan.
The essence of the problem is that Zheng entrusted a lawyer to say that it has been six months since the Sheyang court decided to retry, but it has not yet delivered any new evidence submitted by the defendant, which does not meet the provisions of Article 200 of the Civil Procedure Law on retrial of civil cases. Therefore, Zheng's doubts and complaints are understandable. The above is lawyer Zheng's statement that Zheng's behavior in this incident is excusable, so I hope the court can revoke the judicial punishment decision of detaining him for 10 day and fined him 654,380+10,000 yuan.
Yancheng Intermediate People's Court held that Zheng Haitao sent Weibo to insult and slander the judge through the Internet during the retrial, and the judicial punishment decision made by Sheyang Court was not improper. Yancheng Intermediate People's Court held that in this incident, the judicial decision of Sheyang Court was reasonable, and there was nothing wrong with rejecting Mr. Zheng's application for reconsideration.
At the end, what do you think of this incident? Welcome to leave a message for discussion.