As mentioned above, Nigeria, in fact, there are many countries similar to Nigeria.

For example, "Chad, Cameroon, Sudan, C? te d 'Ivoire, Ethiopia, Tanzania, Kenya, Mozambique, C? te d 'Ivoire, Zambia, Uganda and other countries. Except Namibia, Niger, Mauritania and other countries with less than 20% arable land, almost all countries have the same situation as Nigeria.

The agricultural input is too low and the industrial level is low.

Modern agriculture is not only a problem of throwing seeds, but also involves systematic breeding, agricultural products, agricultural machinery and chemical industry, as well as dozens of secondary industries.

For example, in Nigeria, it is almost impossible to make agricultural tools. Because they don't have steel produced by high-quality steel mills as hoes.

Without chemical plants, it is impossible to manufacture products such as pesticides and fertilizers.

Without the support of "Agricultural University" despised by China people, it is almost impossible to set up a breeding company to breed such a huge amount of cultivated land when the number of agricultural high-tech personnel is almost zero.

Without the support of heavy industry, it is impossible to manufacture agricultural vehicles, tractors and irrigation pipes to transport agricultural materials.

There is no cement industry, so almost all canals are mud canals. The disadvantage of the mud canal is that the dam may be washed away during the rainstorm. Countries such as Nigeria have heavy rainfall, and almost all farmland will be flooded in the rainy season with insufficient drainage.

They have no light industry, so they have to import even sprayers for spraying pesticides.

What they need is not only agriculture, but a whole set of industrial systems! Unfortunately, it is almost impossible for African countries to develop their industries ... because China, two world industrial powers, accounts for about 80% of the world's industrial production capacity and almost crushes the world's industries. Large-scale manufacturing of high-end industries was occupied by the United States, and almost no country in the low-end market could survive a round in front of China.

Therefore, the elites of African countries have a deep despair ... because they can't even develop agriculture. Even being a farmer honestly ... it doesn't matter ... because they have nothing.

Some netizens may say, isn't the whole world helping Africa?

However, we only saw the gymnasiums, schools and enterprises in China, Africa, which helped mine and tap resources. We only see the United States exploiting oil in Angola, Sinopec and PetroChina occupying North and South Sudan and Central Africa, China metal occupying Nigeria and Tanzania, and we only see French industry occupying Ivory Coast.

What animal sanctuary is the United States assisting, rainforest protection, and providing medical assistance to some countries. We only see that France is helping all kinds of medical supplies, weapons and ammunition, and the British are helping countless universal values.

When did five hooligans help a smelter in Africa? Chemical plant? When did you help a whole set of heavy factories? These are all about the country, even if we don't say ... who helped a plastic factory?

No ... everyone is frantically digging for resources. And create Africa's needs according to their own intentions.

For example, the British create political demand in Africa and borrow countless loans to make money. The United States and France create demand for weapons in Africa and export all kinds of weapons. China manufactures industrial demand in Africa and then dumps it in Africa. Britain and the United States jointly created food demand and dumped food in Africa.

In short, we create demand by countless means.

Therefore, in the words of the former President of Nigeria, "Africa's strength and rise can only depend on the hands of Africans", and in the words of the Prime Minister of Tanzania, "Africa is waiting for the dawn in despair. What we have to do is not wait, because our darkness is given by the world. What we should do is to face the light, even if we fall ... don't wait. "

This is agriculture in Africa. .......

I have introduced the basic situation of agriculture in Africa to you, and I believe you should also understand why there are so many fertile fields in third world countries but modern agriculture cannot be developed. Because modern agriculture is linked with industry, there is an inseparable relationship between them, just like the relationship between flowers and hardworking bees in Jade. Flowers need bee pollination to reproduce, while bees need nectar to survive and depend on each other.

So, here is an introduction to the current situation of African industry. I try to write carefully, because there may be some businessmen who are exposed to African business or interested in Africa, and of course there may be young people who are willing to go to this vast market to develop. My writing is not comprehensive, because after all, it involves dozens of countries, and there is no so-called thousand words. May my shallow knowledge be known to you, I am very lucky!

African industry -( 1)

Africa used to have two industrial powers, one of which was a country with many industrial analogies. One is Egypt in North Africa (geopolitically,

Egypt should belong to the Mediterranean countries, and has little to do with Africa), and the other is the southernmost South Africa.

Around the 1970s, countries led by the United States and Britain launched a famous movement-the global integration movement. The word must be familiar to everyone, building a global village, global cooperation and division of labor among countries. Therefore, with the efforts of the United States and Britain, countless masterpieces have been produced and won the recognition of global politicians and business elites. Although economists and military strategists at that time could not be convinced, the mighty global integration began a crazy movement in the 1970 s.

It is necessary to introduce the basic core of global integration, which can be summarized in one sentence, that is, division of labor and cooperation among countries, financial integration, trade liberalization and political transparency as the core. In the process of globalization, the United States and Britain took the lead in opening their eyes. Of course, they eat meat ... The United States is the financial core in the global division of labor, its dollar is the core of world economic flow, the east coast of the United States headed by new york is the global financing center, and the United States is the core of global scientific and technological progress. Britain is the financial core and financing center of Europe. Judging from the situation at that time, Britain and the United States simply cut their own JJ with a knife.

They took the lead in launching the famous deindustrialization movement. For example, Pittsburgh Steel in the United States began to transfer to Europe, South America and other places (of course, it was later transferred to China). Because Britain and the United States have done such a thing, it is very convincing to politicians in third world countries and emerging countries. The reason is simple, the third world countries at that time; Many African countries, such as Nigeria, Cameroon and Tanzania. , are countries that Congo has been independent for a short time, and even some countries, such as Central Africa, Congo and Uganda, are still in extremely chaotic political patterns. There are few politicians with global vision in third world countries, let alone politicians. However, in emerging countries, such as Egypt, Argentina, the Four Little Dragons of Asia and so on, all ruling parties have extremely shallow ruling experience, and most countries have ruling experience of 20 to 30 years. There is almost no ruling experience and no global vision.

Therefore, in the broad global division of labor. Egypt, Greece and other North African countries have successfully achieved industrialization and developed agriculture and tourism. Far away in the developed countries in the south, South Africa is still strong ... Until the famous road of black people who hurt South Africa and even the rise of all blacks appeared, it was a comprehensive industrial category, and many categories were top industrial countries in the world. But ... Mandela, the old enemy of South Africa, came, so at the end of the last century ... Africa was the last country that basically entered the industrial society, and South Africa was also hollowed out and industrialized successfully, resulting in almost no industrial countries in Africa.

Because there are no industrial countries in Africa, Africa's agriculture is truly integrated into the world and closely depends on industrial countries. Because there is no industry, he is almost like an adopted son in military and politics. Have to trade with Europe and America.

Some people may ask. Didn't all countries know the consequences of deindustrialization at that time? Why do you want to do such a thing? Actually, don't you know the proposition of global integration? So far, it is still very, very marketable.

Because everyone wants to be the top country in the world system, I will describe a scene for you. You can make a multiple-choice question.

What kind of life would you like to choose?

1: Sit in a clean and bright office, use the computer to finish all the work, and work no more than 30 hours a week. A holiday of not less than 80 days a year, with a monthly salary of 50,000 US dollars or 300,000 RMB.

My family lives in a luxury villa by a big lake. The air is sweet, the city is in the forest, the blue sky and white clouds are flourishing. The river is so clean that you can see fish swimming in it, and there is almost no environmental noise.

2. Work in a factory, engage in manual labor, and work at least 60 hours a week. The annual holiday is less than 20 days, and the monthly salary is only 500 dollars or 3000 yuan. I live in a crowded city with serious air pollution, and I can't see the sun for a year. Although flowers and trees are being planted, there are no green leaves, and every leaf is covered with dust, which makes the flowers and trees all black. Because of industrial emissions, rivers are just ... colorful, full of the noise of factory construction, and the crazy horns of various vehicles and trucks.

What kind of life would you like to choose? You know, anyone will choose the first life, so de-industrialization is an act that won the hearts of the people. Let heavy manual labor be done by other countries. We make money by engaging in tourism, culture and finance ... Isn't it beautiful?

This is the future that almost all industrialized countries described to their nationals in those years. All countries say-manual labor is what other countries have to do, but who knows who this other person is?

Therefore, in the crazy deindustrialization movement, it is not only Egypt and South Africa that are affected. Nigeria's oil industry has started, and Zambia, Tanzania and Mozambique are located in the south of the Great Rift Valley in East Africa. Although there was civil strife at that time, there were still many black elites who ruled the land and desperately developed industry.

Perhaps no one will remember that Lusaka is also full of chimneys, Maputo has factories, and Malawi can talk. At that time, Abuja even threw out the argument that they wanted to be the new Berlin.

However, the tide of deindustrialization has swept almost the whole African continent, and what South Africa and Egypt have done has made all countries an idiot. The result is today's dilemma. Therefore, for example, Nigeria, an oil-producing country in Africa, has oil fields and its economic growth rate has been the highest in the world. But there is no stamina, because any GDP generated by selling oil is just a pawn on the American chariot. Any fluctuation of the dollar will lead to a huge impact on Nigeria's income, and each impact will have a hierarchical effect. So every drop in oil and every depreciation of the dollar will make countries like Nigeria cry.

For example, Angola, for example, Central Africa, for example, Mozambique, are all resource-rich countries. Rich in mineral deposits, but ... just a pawn in a super chariot. Because of financial kidnapping, the biggest problem in their industrial operation is the cost of debt.

Angola, for example, opened its metal mining industry. The cost of debt actually accounts for the sum of all costs. And all these debt costs come from western financial loans. For a copper mine, assuming a ton 100 yuan (only assuming ha), the mining cost, equipment loss, labor cost, logistics cost and land cost may all add up to 30 yuan. But the loan interest will be as high as 50 yuan. The cost of both adds up to 80 yuan. The only profit is 20 yuan. If the international finished product market fluctuates slightly ... it will be insolvent, leading to the mortgage of the mining industry to foreign companies.

Numerous examples prove that western countries and African countries play in almost the same way. The data given by African Industry shocked the rhythm of peeing pants. Almost 90% of African industrial companies involved in development (such as oil and minerals) were not founded in Europe, America and China, but in fact 90% were founded by Africans. But it is these 90% enterprises that almost all fall into the hands of four hooligans headed by the United States, Britain and France. Africa is not the world of Africans, but the 10% that the United States, Britain, France and China often compete for in hunting, and nine of them are founded by foreign enterprises (for example, Sudan's PetroChina, for example, China Metal's mine in Central Africa, etc. ), and less than 100 enterprises belong to Africans!

African Industry -(2)

(1) basically introduces the basic industrial situation of African countries.

Summarized as; I want an insignificant rhythm ... So Uncle Black can only sigh: "Wealth and I are like floating clouds. It is better to bask in the sun when you are free! "

Africa, which competes with others, has also developed very well. The four hooligans (except Russia) almost all tried their best to develop in Africa.

Although we scum don't care about the future development direction of the world, the five hooligans know it.

The American market has reached saturation, and the European market has no growth rate. In emerging markets, it is difficult for foreign enterprises to set foot in China, a huge consumer market, while the Indian market is an open market, so it is not easy for them to compete with Indian enterprises. Therefore, the fastest growing market of the world economy after 2040 will definitely be in the vast Africa.

The circulation speed of African consumer market is faster than that of the United States (mainly because black uncle doesn't save money, and Americans can save money than black uncle), and it is more inclusive and absolutely liberalized than the European market, and countries will definitely compete for the African market.

The prelude of market competition is "industrial localization". Here, let me explain what "industrial localization" means, such as an iron spoon. Suppose that before the two companies compete for the market, one company mines its own iron ore, which is processed into steel by its own steel company, then made into spoons, and then sent out from the port. In Africa, another company often mines African iron ore, processes it in Africa and then makes it into spoons.

Who will win between the two companies? As long as the IQ is normal, people will categorically say that the latter company will win, for the simple reason ... because the latter company makes full use of the cheap manpower in developing countries, takes advantage of the preferential tax rates in developing countries, takes advantage of the cheap minerals in developing countries, and saves freight. How can we be invincible

According to the market, the former spoon may be 10 yuan, and the latter spoon may be 10 yuan, with the rhythm of buying ten and getting one free.

Therefore, the localization of industry is the most critical link in the competitiveness of enterprises (so GM will "betray the country" and move its production line from Detroit to China).

Then some people will say, since everyone has judged that Africa will become the fastest growing and most stable market after 2040, what are African countries doing? Can't you learn from Deng Xiaoping? Seize the opportunity.

Don't tell me, not all African black uncles are dried goods. There are also very knowledgeable people among them, and one of them almost succeeded ... this man was killed by Gaddafi of France.

Libya is far away in North Africa, but it is a part of Africa after all. So Libyan Gaddafi joined forces with more than a dozen African countries to prepare for the establishment of the African Development Bank and the African Central Bank. Finance takes action before industry, because finance is the blood of industry.

Therefore, the elites of African countries expressed their support in various ways, saying that they would resolutely support the correct decision of the AU under the leadership of the central collective led by Gaddafi. The Nigerian representative attending the meeting pointed out: "Comrade Gaddafi's proposal conforms to the law of historical development, is the only way for African people to run towards a well-off life, and is also the only scientific guiding ideology for African people to stand up." During the meeting, Comrade Gaddafi's speech won the support of African leaders, and warm applause broke out at the scene.

Gaddafi offended four hooligans almost at the same time by establishing AfDB (Russia has little interest in Africa). If the AU financial integration is established, France will bear the brunt. The reason is that almost all banks in French colonial countries are controlled by France. For example, the countries on the front line of Ivory Coast are almost all French puppets. If finance leaves France, industry will leave, and then infrastructure and mining will leave, which will eventually make France unprofitable. Then the Americans were badly damaged, then the British, and finally China.

Therefore, if Gaddafi's action is successful, factories in Africa should start to appear like mushrooms after rain today. But ... Sarkozy directly raped Gaddafi ... ……PS (I personally doubt whether Gaddafi is too high on drugs and dares to provoke five hooligans at the same time)

Therefore, today's Africa ... is not the world of Africans, but the madness of China people in Africa ... In western words, it is simply three days.

African industry has nothing to do with Africa ... after a key link is out of control, African countries are just playthings in the hands of four hooligans. Africa is in four huge shadows ... the dawn is in the distance and rises in the future ... but the future belongs to one of the four hooligans ... it will never belong to Africans!

Gaddafi, then the rotating chairman of the African Union ... He proposed to unify the African currency, establish an African central bank, inject a large amount of capital into the African Development Central Bank, expand the capital reserves of central banks in various countries, including stabilizing African financial markets, and so on ... He took all these into consideration.

But what Gaddafi didn't know was that the more he thought about it, the more he would offend those hooligans. ...

After he became the rotating chairman of the African Union and held an African financial conference ... Gaddafi has sentenced himself to death, and he has challenged the bottom line of all hooligans.

Rogues may tolerate a Gaddafi who makes trouble all over the world, but they will never tolerate a person who tries to unify Africa! Even Gaddafi with nuclear weapons can tolerate it, but Gaddafi with African central bank and non-dollar (similar to euro) can't tolerate it. He can be tolerated to shout and provoke the authority of hooligans all over the world, but he must not be allowed to have the slightest delusion of challenging the interests of hooligans.

So ... his death is inevitable, just make an excuse. All hooligans will acquiesce in ... killing Gaddafi!

African politics -( 1)

The last section is about African industry, which involves many political things. Maybe something is influenced by prostitutes in modern media, which completely distorts everyone's impression. So in this section, let's talk about the happy politics of black uncles!

Africa has a long history, but there are not many successful empires in African history. Apart from Ethiopia, the former Sultanate Empire and the Sanghai Empire, Africa has almost no successful history. The history of Africa is a colonial history, which began thousands of years ago.

For example, the Sultanate was a tragedy thousands of years ago. The title of the king and ruler of Egypt is; The King of Upper and Lower Egypt and Later Ruler of Sudan says that Upper Egypt is close to Ethiopia to the middle of the Nile Valley today, Lower Egypt is the plain part of the sea mouth, and then Sudan is a famous gold-producing empire in history, the Sultanate. For example, The Sanghai Empire is a tragedy.

Therefore, for these reasons, Africa has hardly developed any local politics, let alone outstanding politicians. Because there are too few big African countries, African culture is almost primitive. Anything with the word "original" is hardly a product. Many countries in Africa have no writing, no common language, no common measurement, etc. ...

Therefore, when you understand the history of Africa, you only need to look at the last few hundred years. What happened before was a tragedy.

Why do you want to know their culture and history? Because the soil of politics is culture and history ... politics in Africa began in the First World War.

There are several political factions in African countries, all related to the former sovereign state ... one is harmony, the other is constitutional monarchy, and the third is pan-democracy. But unfortunately, all three people have a strong concept of monarchy.

In the history of African countries' independence, almost all countries except Ethiopia were enslaved, and the upsurge of independence appeared after the end of World War II. Mainly the British colony headed by South Africa in the south and the French colony headed by Nigeria in Ivory Coast, they began to be crazy independent.

Global politics is similar. In the process of independence, different tribes, different people and different classes have different demands, so if they are not handled well, there will be scuffles. After the independence frenzy passed, Africa began a crazy journey of civil war.

And most African countries basically ended their civil wars in the fifteen years from 1990s to 2005 (guess why).

And for these reasons, coupled with the above-mentioned reasons, African politics is extremely naive and short-sighted.

From my personal experience, to what extent African politics is almost naive ... For example, one of their presidents, whose governance level is the level of a mayor in our country, is the level of our deputy magistrate or director.

Several small countries in Africa, such as Tanzania, South Africa (pseudo-BRICS countries), Nigeria, etc ... Their ministers are deputy heads of counties, and their presidents are as good as county heads.

Under the provincial governor, the poor level is simply insane, and the military chief has a fight. Moreover, their grassroots officers (such as county leaders) are not even as good as a keyboard player in political countries such as China and Russia.

The reason for this wonderful situation is that in the process of independence, these illiterate families and tribes won the fruits of victory and formed a unique political group, which prevented the real black elite from entering African black countries.

How bad is their politics? For example, a former president of Cotillard was African-American and returned to C? te d 'Ivoire. A few years later, he rebelled and became president. This kind of example is not news in Africa.

The political level of Americans, such as Bush and Obama, is flattering if they have the ruling level of a mayor in China. You said that the African-American bastard there went to Africa to be president. How powerful he is ... everyone will know.

Of course, not to hack them ... because after all, many times we have to hack them, because Africa really can't get it.

Let me give an example!

Angola used to be a staunch running dog of the United States. Because Angola is rich in oil, the American imperialists tricked his adopted son into following them. Because after several coups, some changes have taken place in Angola. After 2000, President Bush of the United States came blindly, which led to the reduction of funds for the global strategic deployment of the United States. Therefore, the U.S. imperialists focused on African affairs, that is, mainly confronting France and Britain and reducing funds in mature areas.

So for a long time, Angola was the rhythm of American imperialism not peeing. And the biggest opportunity appeared, because China's industry began to rise wildly after 2000 and began to compete fiercely with American industry. For various reasons, American industry has been shrinking. No matter who his father is, Angola, a small country, has to dress and eat ... so it began to trade with China.

Changing the trade target is one of the ways for a country to get rid of the economic control of another big country, so the black politicians in Angola are very excited. Because Angola has oil, but the regional development is uneven, Angolan black politicians think that it is time to have as little contact with the United States as possible and not buy American goods. ...

At that time, China's aides (mainly the China business delegation in Angola) suggested buying American products, that is to say, Angola should control the incremental part by itself (that is, the consumption growth part should trade with China), but try not to reduce American trade. This trick is actually to enter the village quietly, and the gunmen don't ... in a simple way.

But black politicians are radical. Do it or do it. Because they don't know that the main force of international confrontation in peacetime is trade rather than military, and trade should be done as a military action. At that time, their minds were very simple ... a spoon, five dollars for the American emperor and five dollars for the middle school. Why is the special code trading with the United States? As a result, the equal tariff strategy was adopted, which led to the serious unsalable products of American imperialists.

Moreover, they further opened a list of China products, which led to the fact that China's goods were almost the rhythm of all-round encirclement and suppression of US imperialist products. For the United States, this is a bit unbearable ... Isn't Angola his adopted son? Why is the adopted son disobedient?

Fortunately, Angola's trade scale is not very large. The U.S. imperialists only talked about trade balance and trade equality several times, but did not ignore Angola. Angolans made special efforts, because Mozambique began to contact China and their neighboring Zambia ... When they learned about the mineral development conditions provided by China, they immediately felt that they should cooperate with China.

So Angola began to sell oil and minerals to China on the grounds of trade liberalization of the US imperialists ... As a result, it was countered by the US imperialists ... A large number of Angolan politicians were killed and injured, and the US imperialists began to support the opposition forces. Angola can't stand all kinds of birds ... The U.S. imperialists directly locked in Angola's loans and made no concessions to the loans due, as a means to force Angola ... Angola can't stand it after a few moves, so it can only kneel down and sing the rhythm of "conquest" ...

The low political level has caused the economic structure of African countries to be almost the East Indian Ocean ... This has always been a big storm. For example, Cameroon, etc ... are all like this, and they don't know what it means to keep a low profile and step by step ... They like to play big news and are often stunned. For example, the French even used force against small African countries and directly defeated them ... just tableware.

The British, for example, always support many opposition parties.

Their political fragility is crazy, and I can say responsibly ... most African leaders don't even know what the constitution is. According to my statistics, the constitutions of at least nine countries directly copy the constitutions of the four hooligans.

For example, Mandela, a "politician" in South Africa, was praised by the four hooligans for his brilliant deeds ... personally castrated the developed country South Africa and became a third world country ... It's really funny.

silent ...

Although Mandela is now praised by the global media, the reason why he is praised is simple ... He personally crushed a developed country that can lead sub-Saharan Africa and successfully pushed South Africa from developed countries to developing countries.

Comrade Mandela has made great achievements ... that is, those five hooligans dreamed of destroying South Africa in those years, but they never got what they wanted ... But God gave Mandela, won't he smile?

Do you remember? In the years after Mandela became active, China began to take off in southern Africa, and began to establish deep "friendship" with Angola, Mozambique and other countries that never gave up on us.

Mandela ... is commendable from our point of view. He is a good party member, a good Labor Party, a good party member, an excellent French citizen ... What's more, he is a good Australian! But if you stand on the side of Africa and stand on the opposite side of South Africa ... this person can pull out and shoot 1000 bullets!

Forever! Mandela!