Speaking of provident funds, everyone in the workplace is very familiar with them. During the application process, we have a need for provident funds. Provident funds can not only be used to rent a house, but can also be used for loans. However, the provident fund paid to each person is not only related to salary, but also has a great relationship with occupation and region. Recently, the provident fund ranking list for my country's 31 provinces has been released, and in such a ranking list, Tibet, which ranks first, can be said to surprise us. What is the situation in various places?

First of all, Yunnan Province in my country ranks fifth, followed by Xinjiang in my country, and Xinjiang is basically on par with Hubei in my country in terms of provident funds. The province ranking third in my country is Qinghai, and Beijing occupies the second place. Such a proportion has far exceeded that of Shanghai. Tibet ranks first in the provident fund rankings. Maybe many people did not expect that Tibet ranks first, but it has a lot to do with the attributes of the company. The provinces at the lower end of the provident fund rankings include Guangdong, Shandong, Hebei, Henan, Hainan, Shanxi, and Shaanxi. Related to residents' income

Such a ranking must have a great relationship with the per capita income in the region. For example, for Hainan Province, which is relatively low in the rankings, comparing the number of people paying provident fund with the total number of people, it can be seen that the amount of provident fund paid per capita is not even more than half of that in Tibet. It is related to the type of company

In addition to per capita income, it is also closely related to the type of company. For example, for some companies such as banks, petrochemicals, tobacco, and electricity, the provident funds paid by employees are generally relatively relatively high. High. However, for the tourism and catering industry, including some private service industries, the amount of provident fund deposited by individuals is generally relatively low. For Tibet, state institutions account for 46% of all units, of which Chinese enterprises account for 27%, so the vast majority of employees are stably employed. The corresponding provident fund payment amount is relatively high, and it is precisely because of this that Tibet can top the list. For Hainan, the proportion of state-owned enterprises is 14, the proportion of public institutions is 29, and basically 60% are private enterprises.

It is precisely this kind of economic structure and proportion that has led to such a change in this ranking. Compared with other relatively backward provinces, this proportion is relatively obvious. When the proportion of private enterprises is relatively large, the amount of provident fund deposited will decrease accordingly.