In the afternoon, BOE also responded to Shenzhou's statement. BOE said in a statement that Shenzhou violated the terms of the product purchase agreement signed by both parties, and the unpaid amount was suspended. JD.com has been exchanging disputes with China since February 10. I hope to resolve the differences reasonably and legally under the premise of abiding by the spirit of the contract.
After JD.COM issued a statement, Shenzhou answered again, and Shenzhou pointed out
1.JD。 The statement of. COM proves that JD.COM has indeed owed a huge sum of money to China.
2. China has not violated any terms of the product purchase and sale agreement signed by both parties.
3. If JD.COM refuses to pay China's repeated recovery fees, it is a completely reasonable and legal solution for China to sue the court.
Finally, China hopes that JD.COM will abide by the spirit of the contract and pay the loan on time.