Whether buying a house or selling a house, the intermediary is often an unavoidable part. Because the buyers and sellers are not directly connected, there may be some problems in the transaction process. Recently, a woman in Shenzhen is very troubled. She questioned spending more than 40 million to buy a house, and the difference was 2.5 million by the intermediary.

This year 10, a woman in Shenzhen revealed that she bought a house at Shenzhen Bay 1 0 for 410.5 million, but the actual transaction price was only 39 million, 2.5 million less. The woman went to the intermediary to discuss the argument. The intermediary said that the charges were reasonable and compliant. At present, the agent who helped her buy a house has left. For this statement, the woman can't accept it. She asked the intermediary to apologize publicly and return her difference and commission. The two sides are at loggerheads on this issue. They all stuck to their words and said they were fine.

Before leaving the company, the owner and Ms. Xia each offered a lowest price and a highest price. The intermediary may think that the money to reduce the price should belong to her, so the contract is drawn up according to Ms. Xia's highest price. However, the intermediary miscalculated. Unexpectedly, Ms. Xia privately communicated this issue with the former owner, and the difference of 2.5 million yuan also surfaced. After learning the inside story, Ms. Xia couldn't help looking for an intermediary to come back, but the intermediary had already left.

Before the implementation of the Civil Code, the Contract Law called it an intermediary contract, but both the Contract Law and the Civil Code stipulate that intermediaries (middlemen and intermediaries) should truthfully report matters related to the conclusion of the contract to the client. If the broker intentionally conceals important facts related to the conclusion of the contract or provides false information, which harms the interests of the client, he shall not demand payment and shall be liable for compensation.

Safeguard your legitimate rights and interests If the situation reported by Ms. Xia is true and the intermediary charges the price difference, then Ms. Xia can not only ask the intermediary to refund the commission, but also ask the intermediary to bear the losses suffered by Ms. Xia. If the behavior of the employees of the real estate intermediary company is recognized as duty behavior, the relevant legal responsibilities shall be borne by the intermediary company. If the communication with the intermediary company is fruitless, Ms. Xia can bring a lawsuit to the court to safeguard her legitimate rights and interests.