Hello.

I am a law major (I have participated in the legal debate team at school before), and I would like to give you the following suggestions from the perspective of law:

First of all, it needs to be clear that the purpose of this debate is to debate which should be paid more attention to, honesty or system.

Secondly, the key words of this debate are student loan, honesty and system. For keywords, you should be familiar with the basic concepts and usage environment of keywords.

Third, the central idea of this debate is that honesty and system are equally important in student loans. On the positive side, it is important to pay attention to that the importance of honesty and system in student loans is the same, but honesty takes precedence; On the contrary, the opposing party needs to emphasize that honesty and system are equally important in student loans, but the system takes precedence.

Fourthly, from the perspective of the opposing side, I personally think that the positive side can debate on the following points:

1, recognizing the importance of honesty to student loans, but the system should be given priority.

2. The importance of student loan system. (1) The system determines the eligibility of student loans; (2) The system maintains the order of student loans.

3. System is more operable than honesty. Because the system can be determined by normative language and can be manipulated, and honesty depends on a person's morality and values and cannot be manipulated.

4. System and honesty are relative to student loans, just as procedures and entities are relative to justice. Procedural justice is the foundation of substantive justice. Although procedural justice does not necessarily guarantee substantive justice, without procedural justice, even substantive justice will affect legal justice. (See "Discrimination between Procedural Justice and Substantive Justice" for details. )

I hope my answer is helpful to you.

Reference:

Baidu Encyclopedia: Procedural Justice /view/626763.htm

Second, what is the topic of college students' debate about learning?

Argument 1: Yes: Traditional education is more conducive to learning effect, but yes: Multimedia education is more conducive to learning effect.

Debate two, for: theoretical study is more important, against: practical activities are more important.

Argument 3: Pro: Self-effort has a greater impact on academic performance, Pro: learning environment has a greater impact on academic performance.

Argument 4: for: success is more conducive to one's own growth, against: frustration is more conducive to one's own growth.

Debate 5, for: school education is more important, against: family education is more important.

Third, student loans, honesty first. Debate Competition: Positive student loan, honesty first, negative student loan, system first. I put forward a positive argument and asked for a statement.

Honesty is the first, and the system is also aimed at dishonest behavior and achieves the principle of honesty.

Fourth, student loans, honesty first. Debate contest: positive student loan, honesty first, negative help. ...

Honesty comes first, and the system is also formulated for dishonest people, and it is also for honesty. It is necessary to reach an agreement on their behavior and achieve the principle of honesty. ...