Grassroots cadres and experts called for specific guidance as soon as possible to provide institutional norms for promoting reform, at the same time strengthen the dynamic management of collective property rights, increase assistance to the collective economy, stimulate the endogenous motivation of reform, and realize rural revitalization.
The dispute about land ownership is very prominent.
Grassroots cadres told reporters that in the process of assets verification, land ownership is controversial. In addition, at present, the rural population flows frequently, and there are some special groups, such as married women's accounts, son-in-law accounts, adopted people, and sentenced people. Whether they should own shares and whether they should have the same equity treatment as ordinary villagers has become the most controversial issue.
Wang Qingguo, chief of the Rural Economic Management Section of the Agricultural Bureau of Puyang City, Henan Province, said that in the process of assets verification, there was a big dispute over land ownership, and the situation of "inconsistent land certificates" often occurred. The actual land area occupied by some villagers is inconsistent with the land on the farmers' contract certificate, and some farmers may reclaim collective wasteland privately. Due to the lack of perfect laws and policies, there are no specific rules to follow for some behaviors such as confirming rights and assets verification, which may leave an opportunity for some people who make use of reform to make profits.
The "hard bones" shelved when land is confirmed directly affect the reform of rural collective property rights system. Wang Qingguo said that when the land was confirmed, some places could not demarcate the land ownership boundary points and boundaries, and the land ownership disputes that were difficult to solve were shelved. These previously shelved problems were exposed in the process of assets verification, which affected the reform of rural collective property rights system.
This ownership dispute is particularly obvious in Heilongjiang province, which has many administrative systems, such as forest industry, agricultural reclamation, local counties and cities. The reporter learned that there are land ownership disputes between several counties in Heilongjiang Province and the agricultural reclamation or forest industry system. A cadre gave an example. For example, in a place, farmers first cultivated land and then planned to become forest farms. "Farmers have actually planted it for decades, and it is even harder for you to be a woodland. When the land was confirmed, these' hard bones' were put on hold, and now assets can no longer be put on hold. "
In recent years, due to the rapid development of urbanization and the imbalance of regional development, population mobility has had an important impact on the rural population structure. Minhou County, Fuzhou City, Fujian Province, began to identify members in the second half of 20 15, and summarized 24 situations including Shangjie Town and Sugarcane Street, but still failed to achieve full coverage of all situations, and new problems emerged one after another.
The lack of perfect legal and policy support has become a major problem that hinders reform. It is understood that at present, the state has not issued a unified regulation on the identification of collective membership, but only given relevant guidance. In the pilot areas of Henan and Heilongjiang, principled opinions were formulated by counties, but due to the lack of legal support, many grassroots cadres expressed concern. Meng Qinghua, branch secretary of Dongmenglou Village, Qingshuihe Township, Taiqian County, Henan Province, said that both the confirmation of rights and the identification of identity are related to the people. Although some villagers' representative committees have passed the decision, but some villagers have opinions, we are still "uncertain".
The financial service package has not kept up.
After the reform of rural collective property rights system in some areas, the management of village-level resources and assets has gradually become prominent. There are still difficulties in mortgage loans for land management rights in some areas, and rural financial services cannot meet the needs of rural collective property rights system reform.
Luo Liangbiao, deputy researcher of the Rural Economic System and Management Office of the Fujian Provincial Department of Agriculture, said that the original collective organization business activities were not taxed, but after the reform, the status changed and it was necessary to register with the industry and commerce. The highest tax rate was over 50%. This has discouraged the registration of new economic organizations. "If the tax policy of industrial enterprises is used to demand the collective economy, it will be difficult for the collective economy to grow, and the dividends that farmers get in the reform will also be cut."
Compared with collective income, farmers are more concerned about the "realization" of individual property rights and equity. "There are still difficulties in mortgage loans for land management rights in some areas, which is not conducive to the reform of rural collective property rights system." Wang Qingguo told the Economic Information Daily that equity mortgage loans have appeared everywhere, but overall, the proportion is very small, and some financial institutions are relatively slow to promote, so rural financial services cannot meet the needs of rural collective property rights system reform.
As one of the first batch of 29 pilot counties of rural collective property rights system reform in China, Cheng Jinquan, director of the Economic Management Station of Minhou County Agricultural Bureau in Fuzhou City, Fujian Province, introduced that rural collective property rights reform includes possession, income, paid withdrawal, inheritance, mortgage and guarantee. It is reasonable to enjoy these six rights after holding stock warrants. However, at present, only the first four items have been achieved. "Mortgage and guarantee are restricted by banks and have not been fully implemented".