If you want to answer hot topics well, you must understand the original intention of the proposer to ask such questions. Only in this way can you respond accurately and pertinently. The hot topic survey mainly examines the matching degree between candidates and positions, tests the social cognitive level and policy analysis ability of candidates, and examines whether candidates can think and solve problems from the perspective of the government.
For example: "At present, many college students go to the construction site to move bricks to repay loans and mortgage houses in order to buy luxury goods such as iphone and ipad. In this regard, some people say that this reflects the spirit of self-reliance of college students today and should be encouraged. Some people say that this reflects the wrong consumption view of college students and should be guided. What do you think? " It is true that for those students who move bricks to repay loans, this really reflects their self-reliance and their desire to gain value with their own actions, which is commendable. But sitting in the examination room, we represent not only individuals, but also public officials. Everything we say and do will have a great or small impact on other people's society. Just think, as public officials, is it appropriate for us to say this? How will the public feel when they hear our remarks? How many college students will appear on the construction site the next day to move bricks in order to buy I-paid?
Another example: "Some people say that' young cadres should learn to read and read'. How can you do your future work well? " Seeing such a topic, many students are secretly happy, and suddenly their minds are full of ideas, all talking about how to check the words of leaders and observe the color of leaders. However, we shouted all day to "serve the people", and in our future work, we should "love the people, benefit the people, and power the people". As soon as we answered questions, we began to talk about leadership. Is this really appropriate? A competent public official should always keep in mind his identity, say what he should say, do what he should do and serve the masses effectively.
It is not enough to understand the questioner's intention. Candidates should explain their understanding of this problem, express their ideas clearly, let the examiner understand, and reach an understanding. In order to better express their ideas, candidates should clearly express their ideas according to the idea of "putting forward opinions-demonstrating opinions-implementing opinions". Of course, in the process of language expression, candidates must make their language standards comfortable and conform to the language habits of the government.