At the same time, a middle school in Shaya County argued that after the incident, after investigation, it was found that Xiaolin and Xiao A violated the school rules and regulations and had a dispute over smoking. After that, Xiao Ya stabbed Kobayashi with a knife. At ordinary times, the school has fulfilled its obligations of education and safety management. After Kobayashi was injured, the school borrowed 30,000 yuan from Kobayashi's parents as medical expenses, and the school fulfilled its obligation to actively treat Kobayashi. Therefore, the school has no fault in this intentional injury incident and should not bear civil liability. It asked the court to dismiss Kobayashi's parents' lawsuit against the school.

The Shaya County People's Court holds that citizens' right to life and health is protected by law. If the actor infringes upon the civil rights and interests of others due to his fault, he shall bear the tort liability. If the infringer is also responsible for the damage, the liability of the infringer may be reduced. In this case, Xiao Lin and Xiao A had an argument and a fight because of their collision, and then there was a knife wounding incident. Judging from the whole process of the incident, both sides can't handle minor matters calmly, which eventually leads to the expansion of the damage consequences, and both sides should take responsibility for the incident. But Xiao caught up with Xiao Lin after the battle and stabbed Xiao Lin with a knife, suspecting revenge. The situation is very bad, causing serious injuries. Therefore, Xiao A should bear the main fault responsibility for the damage.

At the same time, the injury occurred in a middle school in Shaya County. Although the school actively reported to the police after the incident, assisted in the investigation and arranged for handling, the school failed to find and stop it in time. Schools should be responsible for negligence in accident management and should bear corresponding fault liability. Combined with the actual situation of this case, according to the provisions of Article 6, Article 16, Article 32, Article 39, Article 7, Article 17 and Article 2 of the Tort Liability Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), it is judged that the fault liability ratio of plaintiff Xiaolin, defendant Xiaoa and a middle school in Shaya County is 10% respectively. As the defendant is a person with limited capacity for civil conduct, his guardian parents should bear tort liability according to law. In the end, Xiao's parents compensated Kobayashi for material losses 13000 yuan. After deducting the 5,000 yuan already paid, you need to pay 8,000 yuan more; The school was ordered to compensate Kobayashi for multiple losses 1600 yuan. A middle school in Shaya County borrowed 30,000 yuan from Kobayashi's parents to treat Kobayashi, but the loan did not belong to the same legal relationship with the tort debt in this case, so the court suggested that both parties negotiate to solve it.

The injured school on campus is responsible for compensation. Wu said that the campus injury accident is a common type of infringement cases accepted by the people's courts in recent years, and it is one of the typical cases of compensation for campus injury accidents. Article 7 of the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Personal Injury Compensation Cases stipulates:? Schools, kindergartens or other educational institutions that have the obligation to educate, manage and protect minors according to law, if they fail to perform relevant obligations within the scope of their duties, causing personal injury to minors, or if minors cause personal injury to others, they shall bear corresponding liability for compensation. Minors who suffer personal injury due to infringement by a third party shall be liable for compensation.