Baojun 560 was listed, and the price of 70,000-80,000 yuan was welcomed by many car owners. Its popularity can be seen from tens of thousands of orders. It is true that the 560 has performed very well in terms of price, large space and some humanized design inside. As Yan said, it has many bright spots. You chose 560-you have your reasons for love, but I won't choose 560. I have my reasons for not choosing. To put it bluntly, you get what you pay for, and the price is cheap and the quality is not good. There are many problems with the new car, such as high-speed breakdown, power failure of the whole car, poor reverse gear, soft speed increase at high speed, and so on. In this case, motorcycle support will definitely refute, but swearing is unfounded. Few licensed car owners dare to tell the truth. Bad reverse gear is a common problem and a sophistry. Let me analyze my reasons from the cost:

(1) Baojun 560 is actually the chassis of 730, with an SUV shell (please see Yan's explanation). The chassis of 730 may be suitable for MPV, but it may not match the SUV shell. Some friends may say that many SUVs are evolved from cars. I want to say: Yes, the key is to "optimize and test" when evolving. So has the 560 been "optimized and tested"? Don't! We haven't seen this test yet. Therefore, from 730 to 560, the manufacturer's R&D cost is almost zero.

(2) The 560 rear suspension is a torsion beam related suspension. The performance of this suspension on general roads is not much different from that of multi-link independent suspension, while the performance of torsion beam dependent suspension on rugged roads and potholes is not so good. The cost of torsion beam suspension is much lower than that of multi-link independent suspension. (3) Move the engine and gearbox of the 730 directly to the 560, ok? 560 and 730 have different weights and volumes. Have they been tested? Does it match? I don't know. (4) A post advertised by a manufacturer in the forum said that a car as big as 1.4 tons has the lowest weight. Legend has it that 560 high-strength steel reaches 55%, which is the best safety-I can only haha. Southeast DX7 high-strength steel reached 60%, Sic Bo X65 high-strength steel reached 64%, H6, CS75, Tiggo 5 and X65 all passed the crash test, and all reached the 5-star safety standard. What makes the 560 the best security? From the point of view of high strength steel: 560 should be the worst. (5)H6, CS75, X65, etc. They all passed the durability test of 200,000 kilometers. What about the 560 test? I didn't see the relevant reports, so I reasoned that if there were, the manufacturers wouldn't hide it. What I saw was only the short road test of 560 in Tengchong, Yunnan. It is extremely irresponsible and unacceptable for this kind of car to be put on the market without durability test. This endurance test will be paid by consumers and let mice experiment. On the surface, the price looks very low. What is the reality? If 560 has only 75% service life, then its actual cost is higher than that of 65438+ 10,000 cars. It's a good thing that you love to buy, and it's better not to be afraid of problems. It's boring to entrust. I believe you will sell it, but you will sell it for a while, but in the end you will not keep the value and the quality is unreliable. You were fooled by the car.