In 2020, the Supreme People's Court issued the "Decision on Amending Several Provisions on the Publication of Information on the List of Dishonest Persons Subject to Execution", which means new regulations for old villains and an increase in cases Provisions on deleting the list of dishonest persons after the termination of this execution procedure. In this "Amendment Decision", it was clearly pointed out that after the termination of this execution procedure, the property of the person subject to execution was queried twice through the online execution inspection and control system. No property available for execution was found, and the applicant or other If the person fails to provide valid property clues, the court shall delete the untrustworthy information within three working days.
To sort out what the above decision means, if the person subject to execution has no money, and the person applying for execution or others does not have the money information of the person subject to execution, then the court will delete the information of the person subject to execution. This is said to have achieved good legal and social effects in society. After all, it has improved the relief channels and the provisions for exiting the list of dishonest people. To put it simply, the person subject to execution does not have property to execute, and the court should delete the breach of trust information.
However, this regulation has not been in place for a long time, and there has not been any implementation of this kind of thing in the short term. However, this execution procedure is only in the legal sense that there is no property available for execution. It does not mean that the person subject to execution has absolutely no property available for execution.
Many people agree with this point of view because there are certain restrictions before deleting untrustworthy information. This provision takes into account the balance of interests between the person applying for execution and the person subject to execution to a certain extent, and is intended to ensure the effective effectiveness of the dishonest list system.
However, the meaning of this decision is that after the execution process is completed, although the person subject to execution will be exempted from the punishment for breach of trust, he must still have consumption restrictions. He cannot take high-speed rail or airplanes, and cannot stay in hotels with stars or above. , cannot enter or leave nightclubs or golf courses for consumption. I hope that while the law is improving, more consideration will be given to the interests of those applying for execution. I don’t know what everyone thinks of this modification.