In fact, I think it is imperative to carry out real-name authentication on the webcast platform. In the past, because of the lax supervision of the webcast platform, many anchors were teased by netizens in order to earn popularity and exposed many obscene pictures that violated the bottom line of social morality. For example, the doll incident hosted by Betta tv has also had a serious impact on society.

After the real-name authentication of network anchor, there is no doubt that there is legal responsibility behind it. When they broadcast live on the internet, they always consider the identity of authentication and the responsibility they bear. Can't indulge indifference as before.

Secondly, we can see that these industries will become more and more standardized in the future development of webcasting platforms. The reason why most network anchors want to earn popularity with obscene pictures is inseparable from the ridicule of some netizens. If some anchors don't cooperate, it may lead to the loss of popularity and have a certain impact on personal income. After all, if the anchors of major online platforms want to make money, they must first accumulate popularity. It is another matter to meet several local tyrants.