The index system of comparative analysis is briefly described as follows.
AI gross index
BI economic strength: Through the analysis and comparison of GDP, per capita GDP, total retail sales of social goods, total investment in fixed assets and other indicators, it reflects the current development status and actual level of the city.
B2 Financial strength: Reflect the development degree of financial market and financial financing strength through indicators such as resident livestock deposits, bank loan balance and insurance amount. Financial strength is a powerful weapon for a city's comprehensive competitiveness. Without this means, the agglomeration and diffusion functions of cities will not be brought into play, especially the diffusion functions of cities with capital, technology and products as the mainstay.
B3 Scientific and Technological Strength: Evaluate the ability and foundation of the city in scientific and technological progress and innovation by the indicators of R&D investment, number of patent applications and number of scientific and technological personnel.
B4 Government strength: Due to data collection factors, only fiscal revenue and fiscal expenditure indicators are set at present, reflecting the government's initiative to promote social and economic development.
A2 quality index
B5 development level: By comparing the average annual growth rate of GDP, per capita GDP and total investment in fixed assets of 10, the long-term development level and capacity of the city are investigated from a dynamic perspective.
B6 Industrial Structure: Mainly compare the proportions of three industries and evaluate the advanced level of industrial structure.
B7 Economic Benefit: Evaluate the economic benefit level of the city by comparing the comprehensive productivity and the investment effect coefficient. This is the core project in the comparison of quality indicators, and it is also the main factor that determines the agglomeration of cities and the diffusion of functional ties.
B8 Urban service facilities: The comparison between urban public service facilities and infrastructure reflects the modern service level of the city.
B9 Social environment: Compare the urban environmental conditions from the indicators of per capita living area, per capita public green space area and air quality.
A3 flow index
B 10 GDP flow: due to the problem of data collection, it is impossible to compare this aspect at present.
B 1 1 Population mobility: In the past, we mainly compared the mobility of human resources, such as the number of scientific and technological personnel attracted. Due to the difficulty of data collection, we only conducted the tourist flow, but it also reflected the attraction and agglomeration ability of the city to a certain extent.
B 12 capital flow. Due to the different situations in different cities, some indicators such as foreign exchange trading volume and stock trading volume cannot be compared. Therefore, the comparison between attracting foreign investment and changing conditions at present mainly reflects the agglomeration ability of cities in this respect.
B 13 Physical Flow-By comparing the capacity of cargo transportation, passenger transportation and container transportation, the distribution capacity of the city in this respect is evaluated.
B 14 information flow: the indicators such as holding large-scale exhibitions at home and abroad and holding important international conferences were originally designed. Due to the lack of data, it is only a narrow comparison of information flow, but it also reflects the production and informatization level of information products in cities to some extent.