First of all, there is no way to stop profits from turning back except cutting off profits, but if you do, the market will really develop as expected and it will be difficult to get enough profits. So this is a difficult question to weigh. So you still have to manage your money according to your trading style and habits.
If you fast forward and fast out, you can judge the short-term market accurately and have the energy to keep an eye on the market. The advantage of this method is that the capital curve is stable as a whole and there is no big fluctuation. The disadvantage is that you are tired. If the market really develops as expected, you may have to give up. I once met a master trader, who earned 7 months 17 times. His characteristic is that most of the profits are very small, about 10 to 20 o'clock, and there are few orders with profits exceeding 35 points. The profits of more than 50 points can be counted with your fingers. The profit of more than 50 points is estimated to be the kind of market that does not stop halfway and is pulled up by one line and two lines.
If you are the kind of style that wants to catch the big market, you can also try this method. When the profit reaches a certain level, such as 20 points, you can close your position by half and then set a protective stop loss. If the market develops as expected, you will constantly modify the protective stop loss until the stop loss. Because some profits have been locked in before, the psychological pressure of waiting is less than that of not locking in profits. The advantage of this method is that it is relatively less tiring and can get a larger market. The disadvantage is that you need to endure the return of funds (but there is a lock-in profit, so you won't lose money after the guarantee, and the psychological pressure is small). Maybe after 20 transactions, more than half of the profits only come from two or three transactions. This situation is not acceptable to everyone. However, most experts I have met use this method.
No one can get all the quotations in the transaction, so there must be a trade-off.