If you ask how big a country is, it's better to have a small population. Basically, the later, the fewer people, the better. Of course, the so-called small population has a basic line. Why? Quite simply, fewer people enjoy more resources and the per capita quality of life is greatly improved. People-oriented, the improvement of people's basic quality of life, I think is the ultimate goal of social development? So do you think it's better to have a large population or a small population in China? This different time is not easy to generalize. In the early days of the country's reform and opening up, it was a period of so-called poverty and nothing. Construction needs a lot of people. There needs to be more people. But if we want to develop in the back, as above, we still need a small population. In a word, our country has a large population, which must be said. But what is certain is that when the country develops to a certain period. A small population is definitely better than a large population.