Regarding documentary transactions, the mainstream of the domestic market can be roughly divided into three categories.
A: ea Plug-in Documentary, you need to install an ea Plug-in on the MT4 client (PC only) of Documentary users, and receive trading signals through the plug-in to open and close positions. The advantages are low development cost, simple operation mode of the file platform and no limitation of the trading platform. The disadvantage is that documentary users need to keep MT4 software logged in 24 hours, and the computer can't be disconnected. After all, you can't receive the signal when you are disconnected from the network. Of course, you can also put your client on the VPS server (theoretically equivalent to renting a computer). The mainstream EA documentary platforms in China are (Warring States Policy, Cloud Signal, etc. )
B: Documentary in the platform is simpler. Generally speaking, such documentary platforms are built by brokers themselves and need to be registered as users on their own platforms. The advantage is that followers are easy to use and the operating cost is low. The disadvantage is that the documentary can only be made in a single platform, the signal source is limited, and there is even the risk of being manipulated by brokers. More representative are (e-Turui. Zulu people. Follow me).
C: cross-platform follow-up. This method is more complicated. It is understood that it is necessary to get through the background authority of various brokers. Then run it directly on the cloud server. The advantage is that the user's operation is simpler and more flexible, and he can freely choose various modes and types of signal sources for configuration. More like a combination of A and B, the disadvantage is that it needs a documentary platform to get through the background authority between different brokers. Operating costs will be higher than the first two.