Let's take a look at why this netizen questioned the killing of Meituan's big data.
This netizen placed an order after registering a take-away member of Perfect Group, and found that the delivery fee was much higher than the last one, so he asked the group. At first, the US delegation wanted to give him a ten-yuan red envelope as compensation, but netizens disagreed. Later, Meituan explained that this phenomenon occurred because the software cache affected the positioning. However, due to this response, it also caused people's dissatisfaction.
Second, why did this netizen question it again?
After the response, the US Mission did not take any action. It seems that this matter has just passed. However, this netizen once again questioned, since Meituan said that there is a problem with its software, how should it be solved? Should members affected by caching be compensated? This netizen thinks that this software cache has backed the pot of Meituan. Since Meituan said it was a software problem of its own, it should explain something. Those members who were overcharged for distribution fees should not be cheated like this.
Third, how did the US Mission respond to questions from netizens again?
Although the doubts of netizens have resurfaced, so far, the US Mission has remained silent. No response. This has to make those members of the US Mission feel that they really shouldn't register this member. It is estimated that the number of members of the US Mission may be affected.
About what? Questioning the US Mission's big data to kill users and then making a sound, is the US Mission's response too perfunctory? ? What do you think of this topic? Please leave a message in the comments section.