Current location - Loan Platform Complete Network - Big data management - Why should the rule of law be synchronized with big data?
Why should the rule of law be synchronized with big data?
According to reports, a few days before 20 18, the data security problem caused by personal privacy information became the focus of public opinion, resulting in a situation that there are regulations but it is difficult to implement. The main reason is that various new problems in the big data industry are always difficult to keep up with the corresponding legal provisions, such as whether data should be deleted after the service is terminated. Without corresponding regulations, law enforcement departments may not have the corresponding law enforcement and review capabilities.

According to the report, China has an institutional arrangement between data communication and personal information protection. On June 65, 2065, 438+0, in 2007, the Cyber Security Law issued by the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate and its judicial interpretation came into effect on the same day. For the first time, the behavior of infringing citizens' personal information and the applicable laws were further clarified, and the network security management obligations of network operators were specified in detail. At the same time, a security assessment system for local storage and cross-border transmission of personal information and important data has been established.

However, in the industry's view, the current institutional arrangements are still insufficient. In practice, violations of many platforms are difficult to judge and lack evidence, making it difficult for individual users to safeguard their rights. Therefore, public interest litigation has become one of the few countermeasures at present, so the rule of law should keep pace with big data.

In recent years, there are more and more cases of conflict between data communication and personal information protection, many of which are difficult to be covered by the European Union model or the American model. It is not to transplant outdated protection rules, but to adapt to the characteristics and social needs of the era of big data and create China rules.